Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a brand new idea?
Lay down a Milestone-style chart of what it takes to operate as an ASF
project. Demonstrate community of meritocracy, add committers or ppmc
members based on
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:45 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How about a brand new idea?
Lay down a Milestone-style chart of what it takes to operate as an ASF
project. Demonstrate community of meritocracy, add committers or ppmc
members based on contributions, complete IP review, and
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drop any pretense that the incubator has a say
over the already-done code releases, and we can seriously start the real
discussion, which would have been motivating projects to graduate if we
hadn't wasted several
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drop any pretense that the incubator has a say
over the already-done code releases, and we can seriously start the real
discussion, which would have been motivating projects to graduate if
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a brand new idea?
Lay down a Milestone-style chart of what it takes to operate as an ASF
project. Demonstrate community of meritocracy, add committers or ppmc
members based on contributions, complete IP
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Color me confused again, but during setup and formation of the Incubator,
a podling had to graduate before doing a release. It was rather well
established before this rule was modified, but
