Re: Apache Composer Proposal

2007-10-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
There didn't seem to be any curfuffle at all in floating the proposal through the incubator. That's a good thing. Both containers are heavily used, both originate from these parts and so it's somewhat fitting they would like to return. I'll put up vote thread later today. On 8 Oct 07, at 9:

Re: Apache Composer Proposal

2007-10-08 Thread peter royal
On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal with some interest. A couple of items: 1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus yes, Loom was unsuccessful Phoenix fork. iirc, Plexus borrowed concepts from

RE: Apache Composer Proposal

2007-10-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> 1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus Actually, IIRC, Loom is Phoenix. Hard to keep all of these Avalon byproducts straight. ;-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Apache Composer Proposal

2007-10-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal with some interest. A couple of items: 1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus 2) What about Apache Excalibur, currently home to the various Avalon modules (framework, components, etc.)? --- Noel