Re: CCLAs for Tuscany code, was: Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-10-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Oct 28, 2006, at 12:46 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 10/28/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please > confirm that this is either an oversight or that the

Re: CCLAs for Tuscany code, was: Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-10-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 10/28/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please > confirm that this is either an oversight or that these CCLAs are not > pertinent to this material. The CCLAs are

CCLAs for Tuscany code, was: Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-10-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please confirm that this is either an oversight or that these CCLAs are not pertinent to this material. The CCLAs are pertinent and were sent to Jim on 2005-12-28 as recorded