What's the right/official place to verify if someone has a CLA in
place with Apache ? I'm looking into [1] but can't find the names I'm
looking for, even though the persons have faxed the CLAs twice.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the right/official place to verify if someone has a CLA in
place with Apache ? I'm looking into [1] but can't find the names I'm
looking for, even though the persons have faxed the CLAs twice.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
.
It sets an expectation on contributions for the community as a whole,
rather than relying only on CLAs from the relatively small subset
of the community that are committers. In other words, it reduces
our liability, or at least that is the hope.
Roy
that. What is the correct
procedure here?
Should we ask the ASF for details regarding the contributor's CLA? Or
should we take an email/bugzilla assertion from the contributor that the
CLA has been sent, as enough?
I'd tend towards the former, myself ;)
CLAs are not required for each bug fix
the former, myself ;)
CLAs are not required for each bug fix. They are required for
substantial contributors over a period of time, i.e., committers.
The names on the following list that are in italics are the committers
who have signed CLAs on file:
http://www.apache.org/~jim
Hi incubator folks --
I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project.
As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few contributions
from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to be applied, once we
know that the submitter's CLA status allows that. What is the
