"Apache CMS". Though the lenya people would probably cringe. :-/
BTW: In Germany, such a trademark would be void. You could protect an
image containing the word "grafitti", but not the word itself.
Regards
Henning
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 20:16 +0100, Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
Le 23 déc. 04, à 17:59, Noel J. Bergman a écrit :
The question was more from a legal standpoint would a Java
based CMS software and a hand-recognition system embedded
in physical devices be considered in the class and thus
infringing or separate applications and thus be non-infringing ?
You'd have
> The question was more from a legal standpoint would a Java
> based CMS software and a hand-recognition system embedded
> in physical devices be considered in the class and thus
> infringing or separate applications and thus be non-infringing ?
You'd have to check with our lawyer(s), but I'd thin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As soon as I saw the message subject, I thought of the other project, which
actually pre-dates Palm, and was first available on the Apple Newton.
Yes me too. The question was more from a legal standpoint would a Java
based CMS software and a hand-recognition system embedded
As soon as I saw the message subject, I thought of the other project, which
actually pre-dates Palm, and was first available on the Apple Newton.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Working with the JCMS team on the existing IP, we found that JCMS was not
a good name because a CMS package with this name already exists even
though it's
not trademarked in the US (Jalios JCMS).
The team wants to change the name to 'Graffiti' but of course there's
already a Palm
trademark on th
