Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:49, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There was a discussion on the board list at the end of 2002. What was
basically the point was that every external codebase would come through
Incubator. No exceptions (for obvious reasons). IIRC the conclusion
was that no PMC was to
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There was a discussion on the board list at the end of 2002. What was
basically the point was that every external codebase would come through
Incubator. No exceptions (for obvious reasons). IIRC the conclusion
was that no
There is some confusion here, I'll try to be clear.
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubated on the premises that it wants to
become a TLP for artifact
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 05:08, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
There is some confusion here, I'll try to be clear.
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubated on the
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:49, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubated on the
