On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on this
thing, without it
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
Potentially, yes. Likely, no :-)
If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the
2009/6/24 Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
If not, how
i would think that if there is someone contributing to the project
that the
community would recognize and add them themselves. it isn't up to the
mentors to do anything except perhaps suggest they consider it if
they're
being really thick about it.
it would be cool if the mentors might
Scott Comer wrote:
i would think that if there is someone contributing to the project
that the
community would recognize and add them themselves. it isn't up to the
mentors to do anything except perhaps suggest they consider it if they're
being really thick about it.
A bit too convoluted a
When is a community Apache Ready™? According to our exit criteria (iirc):
- when the community has performed at least one Apache release
- when the community has cleaned the code from all license issues
- when the community is diverse and open
My current issue is with the definition of open.
On Wed 24 Jun 2009 06:08, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
My current issue is with the definition of open. Not necessarily as
documented (haven't looked at the text lately), but as a gut feeling:
when is a community open?
- all (technical) discussions happen on publicly
