Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Is this about competing podlings? or existing projects/new podlings?
The Competing Projects thread is a general umbrella of how the incubator
should approach any two proposed podlings that overlap in scope, or a
proposed podling that overlaps in scope with an existing
Is this about competing podlings? or existing projects/new podlings?
-- dims
On 12/26/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 23, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think it's a concern because the precedent puts the podling on the
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 14:24, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
People can truly dislike others in the same
project, and yet collaborate towards a common goal.
If we take another heated example, Avalon, which was heavily criticized for
its unhealthy community; IMHO, it was the different
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 23, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think it's a concern because the precedent puts the podling on the
defensive and in the mind set of oh, if there's a competing project,
we won't accept you. The fact that there's a project already here
that
On Dec 22, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/22/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A simple one-liner similar to Geir's No other ASF project
or podling in the architecture space is based on Jini
is enough I think...
This is getting off-topic, but really why do we
On Dec 22, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
We have lots of competing proposals and projects all across the ASF.
And, many of them don't communicate for extremely petty and personal
reasons;
IMO, that is a shame... competition is good. Territorialism
(if that's even a word :) )
On Dec 23, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/22/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A simple one-liner similar to Geir's No other ASF project
or podling in the architecture space is based on Jini
is enough I think...
On 12/23/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really fail to see how all that is such a big deal.
We're talking an additional 2 sentences
I think it's a concern because the precedent puts the podling on the
defensive and in the mind set of oh, if there's a competing project,
we
On Dec 23, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/23/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really fail to see how all that is such a big deal.
We're talking an additional 2 sentences
I think it's a concern because the precedent puts the podling on the
defensive and in
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
We have lots of competing proposals and projects all across the ASF.
And, many of them don't communicate for extremely petty and personal
reasons; some don't communicate because they disagree on the technical
direction.
While they are within the Incubator, I'd prefer
On 12/23/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While they are within the Incubator, I'd prefer to see the extremely petty
reasons reduced.
And, I'd like a pony, too. =P -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/23/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While they are within the Incubator, I'd prefer to see the extremely petty
reasons reduced.
And, I'd like a pony, too. =P -- justin
Did you ask Santa? :)
--
On 12/22/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A simple one-liner similar to Geir's No other ASF project
or podling in the architecture space is based on Jini
is enough I think...
This is getting off-topic, but really why do we care?
We have lots of competing proposals and projects all
13 matches
Mail list logo
