Re: Dormant/retired codebases

2006-12-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
phoenix.apache.org? Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 12/24/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually ... what if we were to establish an area under incubator/, which we need anyway for podlings that get retired, and allow whichever PMCs are currently responsible for them to move all

Re: Dormant/retired codebases

2006-12-27 Thread Craig L Russell
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: phoenix.apache.org?\ Good one. Craig Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 12/24/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually ... what if we were to establish an area under incubator/, which we need anyway for podlings that get

Re: Dormant/retired codebases

2006-12-26 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 12/24/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually ... what if we were to establish an area under incubator/, which we need anyway for podlings that get retired, and allow whichever PMCs are currently responsible for them to move all retired codebases to there? If people come

Dormant/retired codebases

2006-12-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Yoav Shapira wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Given the peculiar nature of log4php, I think there's a rather odd notion available of considering it to retire from incubation into the logging project as a retired subproject. Close down the lists, and keep the svn as it is in logging/. Given

Re: Dormant/retired codebases

2006-12-24 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 25 December 2006 02:20, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Actually ... what if we were to establish an area under incubator/, which we need anyway for podlings that get retired, and allow whichever PMCs are currently responsible for them to move all retired codebases to there? If people come