On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:05:15 +0100
From: Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org, infrastruct...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums
Sender: shaposh...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Roman
Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
+infra
Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the
other.
Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
the question?
Question: how do we go
That page is part of the
Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page by using the following
http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF members can create a
ticket within jira under the infra project and attach a patch for the
changes they would like to make.
The repo and file you
Henk P. Penning wrote on Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:08:33 +0100:
The reason given I ended up writing a Perl script doesn't
make sense ; .md5 files come in many forms but the algorithm
to verify is the same for all of them (there are no 'variations.') :
verify (checksum md5, .md5-file
Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500:
That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page
by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF
members can create a ticket within jira under the infra project and
attach a patch
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:25:54 +0200:
Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500:
That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page
by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF
members can create a
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Henk P. Penning penn...@uu.nl wrote:
I am +1 on suggesting (on that page) a 'normal' form for
the content of a .md5 file.
I'll take a crack at it now that I know where the source is ;-)
I am definitedly -1 on removing the gpg line above, or
suggesting
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Releases and new committers are pretty much the only time I'd expect to see
votes in an Apache community.
Understood. My question was specifically about the
process used by ASF to manage its top level web
pages. Now I know.
Hi all,
Question: how do we go about discouraging it then? Do we need a vote
to modify the content of:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#md5
I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
formats, I personally don't see this as a show stopper for our
+infra
Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other.
Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
the question?
Question: how do we go about discouraging it then? Do we need a vote
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use
Hi,
I think that would be a fine choice. I'm fine with releasing it as is for
now
+1 (binding).
Thanks! Could you post your vote to the formal release thread as well?
That said -- I'd like to see the next release take into account the
feedback
that has been provided to the project so
Roman Shaposhnik wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:05:15 -0800:
+infra
Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other.
Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
the question?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I find it difficult to verify the GPG generated checksums.
Ditto. It's particularly awkward when the hash is wrapped over several lines.
I ended up writing a Perl script to handle all the variations.
If I'm not alone
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it
Hi all,
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
There are several other projects who do use the same tools. Cloudstack even
list on their
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
What does gpg --verify do?
http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
(Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable
On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
(Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable
21 matches
Mail list logo
