Hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> almost there, the only remaining issue blocking the release is JSPWIKI-744,
> which is almost complete, should be finished this week (most probably
> tomorrow or Tuesday). So, the vote should be casted real soon.
Great ne
Hello Jukka,
almost there, the only remaining issue blocking the release is JSPWIKI-744,
which is almost complete, should be finished this week (most probably
tomorrow or Tuesday). So, the vote should be casted real soon.
br,
juan pablo
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
Hi JSPWiki,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Again, like in April, I'd note that the most pressing blocker is
> getting an Apache release out.
Any progress on this front?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscr
Hi Dave,
thanks for the tip :-) Actually we're downloading a few LGPL jars via
maven-ant-tasks,
but this approach seems simpler for our libs, as we won't have to deal with
transitive
dependencies.
br,
juan pablo
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 10:38
On Jul 12, 2012, at 10:38 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 July 2012 22:26, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> wrote:
>> Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
>> technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
>> (distributing dependencies alongside source), altho
On 11 July 2012 22:26, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
> technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
> (distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one.
> I'll file a Jira and reflect
Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
(distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one.
I'll file a Jira and reflect it at the project incubation status page.
regards,
juan pablo
O
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> Regarding the binary dependencies. Wasn't the discussion on general@ more
> focused on (or raised because of) transitive dependencies which were
> brought into the build and not being AL-compatible?
No, all the dependenci
Hi Jukka,
answers inline:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> > + Still following the objetive of making the first Apache release:
> > +
> > + 4 JIRA issues were fixed since last period, the project website has
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> + Still following the objetive of making the first Apache release:
> +
> + 4 JIRA issues were fixed since last period, the project website has been
> revamped,
> + and few other niceties & fixes have got into trunk (for example lucene
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
