On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:53:44 +0200
(Subject: Re: LOGGING TLP (Re: request for feedback on usage log management))
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tetsuya,
> From an architectural perspective, I think the logging component should
> delegate i8n support to a specialized c
Tetsuya,
From an architectural perspective, I think the logging component should
delegate i8n support to a specialized component. So it makes sense for
log4j to rely on "i18n" TLP project although more information on the
"i18n" project is needed to pursue the discussion.
Where can I find more
I am wondering how it would be if the "i18n" TLP project (not yet
proposed) can tightly build up a closer connection with logging
TLP ... because all the commercial products have the error/log
messages in each native laguages (Oracle, MS, etc.)
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
On Tue, 05 Aug 2
