Yeah... kind of hard for me to vote while I was on vacation last week.
Didn't happen, but that is not a problem.
As Justin notes, our job is to *mentor* ... that doesn't mean we are
obligated to vote. Voting on a release implies a large commitment to
downloading the tarball, building, deploying,
As a podling member, who's been observing here for a couple of months I
have a question here:
What are the principles the incubator uses to decide whether or not to
accept a podling? I know there are a few questions that all podlings have
to answer when creating their proposal, but I haven't
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>> I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there
>> may be problems with too many podlings/inactive
I will admit to being somewhat of a quiet mentor for Mynewt, particularly with
respect to vetting releases. I have been monitoring the community and signing
off on reports.
I've often seen more experienced mentors vote on releases, and held back on
voting based on trust in them. I'll try to do
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there
> may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is not an
> issue we often face.
Justin Mclean has voted on so many releases
Hi,
> as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
> guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Justin
-
To unsubscribe,
On 05/28/2016 05:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> And where is the sources for that?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman
And where is the sources for that?
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Thanks Justin,
> > as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over
> time. I
> > guess it is time to take a look
On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Thanks Justin,
> as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
> guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
Or projects.apache.org :) Since there's already an incubator chart there
- should be easy to add another
Thanks Justin,
as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
Cheers
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > An additional graph that would be super-interesting to
Hi,
> An additional graph that would be super-interesting to get is "Months in
> Incubation" for the current podlings, plotted over time.
Some of the data can be found here [1] (column B)
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general
there may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is
not an issue we often face.
It is simply that this release came at a time when some of our mentors
were busy, and we want to get a release out the door—
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I can agree that there's an issue with the overall number of podlings
> around. However, I don't agree with telling a podling that the IPMC isn't
> going to look at your vote and that your mentors should do that.
I can agree that there's an issue with the overall number of podlings
around. However, I don't agree with telling a podling that the IPMC isn't
going to look at your vote and that your mentors should do that.
The funny thing though, MyNewt has more than the recommended 3 mentors, yet
this is
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I respectfully disagree... One of the main reasons we went from 1 to 3
> recommended mentors, way back in the days, was that those 3 would be the
> primary people to ping for binding votes, without limiting the rest of
I respectfully disagree... One of the main reasons we went from 1 to 3
recommended mentors, way back in the days, was that those 3 would be the
primary people to ping for binding votes, without limiting the rest of the
IPMC to do so.
If that is no longer the consensus, then we need to look at the
16 matches
Mail list logo