Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

2016-08-03 Thread Josh Elser
John D. Ament wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM Josh Elser wrote: - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say that I do *not* think this is remotely close to the level

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

2016-08-03 Thread Josh Elser
Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser wrote: - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say that I do *not* think this is remotely close to the level

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

2016-08-02 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at > the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say > that I do *not* think this is remotely close to the level that we've > seen

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

2016-08-02 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week... > > Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in > addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the > email

On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

2016-08-02 Thread Josh Elser
Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week... Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the email backlog is caught up, anyways). - I think there is a very fair point brought