, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: PPMC to IPMC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Taking a larger interest beyond a podling is nice but not required for IPMC
membership.
+1, not a requirement.
We certainly don't expect members to do anything like that, so why should we
@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: PPMC to IPMC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Taking a larger interest beyond a podling is nice but not required for IPMC
membership.
+1, not a requirement.
We certainly don't expect
- Original Message -
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: PPMC to IPMC
My opinion: It's one thing to try to involve yourself in the fortunes
of one
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:52:29PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
Sounds intriguing. How is this done? I'm afraid I'm vague as to the
process by which people become IPMC members.
It's the same as with any other PMC at Apache: an existing PMC member proposes
a candidate and runs a vote on the
@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:29 PM
Subject: PPMC to IPMC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:52:29PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
Sounds intriguing. How is this done? I'm afraid I'm vague as to the
process by which people become IPMC members
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Taking a larger interest beyond a podling is nice but not required for IPMC
membership.
+1, not a requirement.
We certainly don't expect members to do anything like that, so why should we
expect it of non-members?
Let's separate
From: Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: PPMC to IPMC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800
