Re: Populating the initial PPMC

2013-11-21 Thread ant elder
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: Still, this isn't the hill I want to die on. I think that starting with an empty PPMC is good policy for a variety of reasons, but I'm willing to be flexible for the sake of building consensus on how to address the

Populating the initial PPMC

2013-11-20 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: I am concerned that it would be dis-empowering to the incoming community if at least the active and major developers of the podling were not on the PPMC at the start. I don't see how we might divide up an Initial Committer

Re: Populating the initial PPMC

2013-11-20 Thread Dave Fisher
Dislike. For small projects, PPMC == Committers is a great starting point. For huge projects like OpenOffice something like this would have been chaos unleashed. If it were 3 or 4 then I would not have volunteered to be a Mentor for Apache Flex. To me the answer should remain somewhere