Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sorry. Misread ur email. invite was only for rdonkin and jochen.
You misread the literal meaning but read the intended meaning correctly ;-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten
Sorry. Misread ur email. invite was only for rdonkin and jochen.
-- dims
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> count me in :)
>
> --- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Hammant wrote:
> >
> > > Nicola,
> > >
> > >> Section 4: identify the initial set of committe
count me in :)
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> > Nicola,
> >
> >> Section 4: identify the initial set of committers
> >>
> >> # Jochen Wiedmann (JaxMe? project founder, formerly perl.apache.org)
> >> # Robert Burrell Donkin (jakarta.apache.org/commons
Paul Hammant wrote:
Nicola,
Section 4: identify the initial set of committers
# Jochen Wiedmann (JaxMe? project founder, formerly perl.apache.org)
# Robert Burrell Donkin (jakarta.apache.org/commons)
With a couple of Apache old hands on board, perhaps the Incubator PMC
can have a light steerag
Nicola,
Section 4: identify the initial set of committers
# Jochen Wiedmann (JaxMe? project founder, formerly perl.apache.org)
# Robert Burrell Donkin (jakarta.apache.org/commons)
With a couple of Apache old hands on board, perhaps the Incubator PMC
can have a light steerage of this one. Rober
theaimsgroup.com/
(Do it by ourselves)
---
Cheers!
__ Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
(Subject: Re: Proposal: JaxMe as an implementation of JAXB)
Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Awesome!!!. Please let us know as soon as someone signs up for "shepherd"-ing this
contrib. I'll
start the looking at "initial steps stated in the root STATUS file of our CVS" soon.
-- dims
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > looks like there are no ob
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
contributor agreements signed
I spoke to soo, maybe we already have them ;-)
Section 4: identify the initial set of committers
# Jochen Wiedmann (JaxMe? project founder, formerly perl.apache.org)
# Davanum Srinivas (ws.apache.org)
# Robert Burrell Donkin (jakarta.ap
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
looks like there are no objections so far and we can stick to the names of cvs modules
and mailing
lists.
What is the next step? (incubator PMC VOTE?) please advise.
As the ws PMC has already voted in the project [1] (correct me if I'm
wrong), the project is already in inc
looks like there are no objections so far and we can stick to the names of cvs modules
and mailing
lists.
What is the next step? (incubator PMC VOTE?) please advise.
-- dims.
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Hammant wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Proviso :-
> >
> > CVS repos sh
Paul Hammant wrote:
+1
Proviso :-
CVS repos should be incubator prefixed not ws ..
ws.apache.org should be incubator.apache.org
Actually IIRC and IIUC, the last decision that has sprung up from the
"xmlbeans" incident was that if a project is already been voted for
entrance in another PMC, the
+1
Proviso :-
CVS repos should be incubator prefixed not ws ..
ws.apache.org should be incubator.apache.org
Regards,
- Paul
[ Incubator PMC member, not in this reply speaking on behalf of the PMC ]
Hello,
in compliance with a previous vote on webservices-general (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup
Hello,
in compliance with a previous vote on webservices-general (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10619838661&r=1&w=2 and
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JaxbProposal for details) I
would like to propose the JaxMe project for incubation. The proposal is
available on
h
13 matches
Mail list logo
