Hi,
On 8/17/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone interested in mentoring Sling?
Still looking for a third mentor, preferably from outside Day.
I guess we could also go forward with just two mentors for now, given
that we have two other IPMC members (Carsten and Bertrand, both from
Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On 8/17/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone interested in mentoring Sling?
Still looking for a third mentor, preferably from outside Day.
I guess we could also go forward with just two mentors for now, given
that we have two other
On 8/27/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still looking for a third mentor, preferably from outside Day.
I'll help.
Thanks!
I think we have everything in place now in the proposal and there's no
active discussion going on, so I'll follow the
Hi
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2007, 21:25 +0200 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino:
Anyone interested in mentoring Sling?
Count me in.
Thanks, your listed.
Regards
Felix
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 8/17/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sling Proposal
[...]
Nominated Mentors
* Jukka Zitting (jukka at apache dot org)
Anyone interested in mentoring Sling?
Count me in.
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Hi,
On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sling Proposal
[...]
Nominated Mentors
* Jukka Zitting (jukka at apache dot org)
Anyone interested in mentoring Sling?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Noel,
Seems to me that you might want to consider a binding for JSR-286 Portlets
(using the Event mechanism to deliver the content to be rendered), rather
than create a totally new UI component framework. I can't see any reason
why the nested includes would be an issue.
Just a thought,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 09:27 -0700 schrieb Eelco Hillenius:
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. The proposal
text is attached to this message and can also be found at [1].
+1.
Thanks :-)
It seems to be primarily focussed on content delivery, not so much
Felix Meschberger wrote:
As Alex also pointed out, the goal is to have a flexible framework to
allow for different bindings.
Ah, that was not clear from the proposal. I thought that you were planning
to define your own, new, component model for delivering the content back to
the requestor.
I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we
know if
JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license, or has Sun
encumbered
it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
We don't know. We won't implement
On 8/11/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Noel J. Bergman:
[... snip ...]
Seems to me that you might want to consider a binding for JSR-286 Portlets
(using the Event mechanism to deliver the content to be rendered), rather
than create a totally new UI
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Noel J. Bergman:
As such each request URL addresses a Content object which in turn
resolves to a Component, which finally is responsible for handling
the request and providing a response.
And this differs from a Servlet/Portlet, how?
With Servlet/Portlet the
Hi Noel,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 23:12 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
As such each request URL addresses a Content object which in turn
resolves to a Component, which finally is responsible for handling
the request and providing a response.
And this differs from a Servlet/Portlet,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. The proposal
text is attached to this message and can also be found at [1].
+1.
It seems to be primarily focussed on content delivery, not so much
interactivity, right? As such it would handle a sub set of what most
other web frameworks
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 21:23, Felix Meschberger wrote:
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling.
+1, as Incubator PMC member.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here;
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 22:20, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀:
Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this
would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I
have seen this in the
Hi Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀:
Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this
would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I
have seen this in the attached proposal.
The reason for not simply adding it as
On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀:
Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this
would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I
have seen this in the
Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this
would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I
have seen this in the attached proposal.
tia,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to
As such each request URL addresses a Content object which in turn
resolves to a Component, which finally is responsible for handling
the request and providing a response.
And this differs from a Servlet/Portlet, how?
Recognizing the need to componentize development of Web
Applications and
20 matches
Mail list logo
