Thanks Ant - our dev list agrees that we should be adding some information about what is being updated - we will include this in future releases.
With that, we have 3 votes we need, we appreciate your guy's time in revewing our release. ~Prescott ---------------------------------------- > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:12:29 +0000 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > From: ant.el...@gmail.com > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Looks ok to me. In future releases it might be good to consider > including a release notes type file that mentions whats been updated > in the release > > +1 > > ...ant > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We could use another vote or two, > > > > Thanks! > > > > -P > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > ________________________________ > > From: Benson Margulies > > Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > > > Well, fine, I am happy to +1. > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file > >>>> based on recent traffic here. > >>> > >>> LOL > >>> > >>>> Unfortunately, that conversation left me > >>>> with a giant headache and no clear idea. > >>>> > >>>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not > >>>> a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!) > >>>> > >>> > >>> Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required might be a > >>> blocking problem but including just a little more than is necessary > >>> isn't IMHO. If it was a podling release with so much unnecessary stuff > >>> that it showed they didn't really understand the requirements maybe > >>> thats worth voting against so they go and sort it out but for > >>> something like this i think its ok to say sort it out later > >> > >> I am of the same opinion here. I think that some votes on this list are > >> overly critical, often laden with personal opinions and not real > >> Foundation requirements. This leads to a very frustrating experience to > >> new podling members who are unable to tell the difference. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org