On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:56, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html
>
> i have the impression that howard is one of those people who dominates
> by his charisma and energy rather than any abuse of the process
Yes, and I hope
On 9/26/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> > sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
> > projects as a real problem.
>
> +1
>
> T
On 9/25/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> > sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
> > projects as a real problem.
>
> +1.
>
>
On 9/25/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
> projects as a real problem.
+1
Theres more of an issue IMO with projects that don't come thru the
inc
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dims wrote:
Niclas Hedhman asked:
Do we have any examples where corporate backing has been withdrawn, and
how
the project was affected, whether inside or outside ASF?
TSIK -> Verisign folks lost interest, community did not form, project
shelved.
Plus Kabuki, Heraldry
On Sep 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
Neither do I...
--
On 9/25/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
> projects as a real problem.
Actually I think it's showing the incubator's success even if it's alwa
> One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of
> incubating projects as a real problem.
Neither do I. It merely underscores the need to make sure that there is
such a sustainable community. But Niclas did ask for ex
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
+1.
If we knew for sure that a project would be able to attract a
community
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
On 9/25/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims wrote:
> > Niclas Hedhman asked:
> > > Do we have any examples where corp
Dims wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman asked:
> > Do we have any examples where corporate backing has been withdrawn, and
how
> > the project was affected, whether inside or outside ASF?
> TSIK -> Verisign folks lost interest, community did not form, project
shelved.
Plus Kabuki, Heraldry, and possibly Loka
TSIK -> Verisign folks lost interest, community did not form, project shelved.
-- dims
On 9/25/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007 04:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > this is probably just an indication that it's time to starting thinking...
>
> +1 t
12 matches
Mail list logo
