Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/9/2011 11:00 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > If any of this is unclear or if I got anything wrong, please speak up. You might just want to clearly mark on ballot *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] ---

RE: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Sam Ruby wrote: > Unless I see pushback that merits waiting further, I plan to call for > a vote approximately 24 hours from now (noon EDT). Please count my +1 vote. I will be traveling, and I don't know what my Internet access will be during the voting timeframe. There are a lot of issues to

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Lets go for it. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > First some current stats: > > 73 committers. > 18 currently have iclas on file. > 29 have openoffice.org email addresses. > 8 have ibm email addresses. > 8 mentors > > Overall, it looks to me like discussion is slowing, and general

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread robert_weir
sa3r...@gmail.com wrote on 06/09/2011 12:00:22 PM: > > If any of this is unclear or if I got anything wrong, please speak up. > Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically, then at least by convention, when the call for a vote has been made? -Rob ---

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 9, 2011 9:29 AM, wrote: > > sa3r...@gmail.com wrote on 06/09/2011 12:00:22 PM: > > > > > If any of this is unclear or if I got anything wrong, please speak up. > > > > Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically, then at least by convention, > when the call for a vote has been made? Yeah.

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread David Crossley
Greg Stein wrote: > wrote: > > > > Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically, then at least by convention, > > when the call for a vote has been made? > > Yeah. Yes. However we have lost our ability to oversee the Wiki. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3668 Moin Wiki change notifi

RE: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
, June 09, 2011 18:54 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal Greg Stein wrote: > wrote: > > > > Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically, then at least by convention, > > when the call for a vote has been made? > > Yeah. Yes. Ho

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-09 Thread David Crossley
articular activity? > > = Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 18:54 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal > > Greg Stein wrote: > >

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
There are still people signing up as initial committers. Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > First some current stats: > > 73 committers. > 18 currently have iclas on file. > 29 have openoffice.org email addresses. > 8 have ibm ema

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > There are still people signing up as initial committers. > > Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote? There's no problem with them joining later, is it? -- Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-10 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > >> There are still people signing up as initial committers. >> >> Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote? Deadlines are good at inciting action. :-) > There's no

Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal

2011-06-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>>> Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote? > > Deadlines are good at inciting action.  :-) > >> There's no problem with them joining later, is it? > > Nope. Its just a bit more complicated as they need to get voted in. > I intend to proceed as planned. Fine for me. > > - Sam Ruby >