On 9/28/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just ran the tool on the Wicket 1.2.2 distribution, just to see how
we stack up and how much we need to change our release.
I came up with some questions when I read report that came out of the
tool, and would like to see what the
On 9/28/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially the apt format doesn't work
together with comments.
comments work fine with xml and fml. i'm surprised that apt doesn't
allow comments. perhaps jason or brett might be
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
My question is, should all these [source] files get the ASL headers?
All source files should have appropriate headers. If its apache-owned,
ASL-licensed source, it should have the ASL header.
This would
be a hard hit for the embedded
On 9/28/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I took the liberty of looking at the Struts 2 release, and they don't
have license headers in the aforementioned files.
That's a Bad Thing(tm).
Tattletale! :)
Don
LSD
