Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

2021-01-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) but the NOTICE file need updating to include “This product includes software developed at…" I checked: - incubating in names - signatures and hashes are file - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE is a bit too minimal please see [1] - all source files have ASF headers - no unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

2021-01-20 Thread Arpit Agarwal
Dear IPMC members, We need one more binding vote for this release - the two mentors have already voted. Thanks, Arpit > On Jan 19, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Uma gangumalla wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Built from source and ran tests. - All passed > LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files exist. > Sigs and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

2021-01-19 Thread Uma gangumalla
+1 (binding) Built from source and ran tests. - All passed LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files exist. Sigs and checksums are ok. Incubating tag in name exist. Regards, Uma On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:44 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > Hi Apache Incubator IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.6.0-rc0 release

Re:[VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

2021-01-16 Thread Juan Pan
Hi, +1 (non-binding), my checking list, [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. [x] Source code built successfully

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

2021-01-14 Thread Arpit Agarwal
+1 (binding) - Incubating in name - Verified signature, checksums - Disclaimer okay - LICENSE, NOTICE files look okay - Built from source On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:43 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > Hi Apache Incubator IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.6.0-rc0 release is just passed on the PPMC >