Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

2016-06-10 Thread Reynold Xin
+1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - names contain incubating > - signatures good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE correct > - There are NO unexpended binary in the source release > - All files have apache headers > - Can c

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

2016-06-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - names contain incubating - signatures good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - There are NO unexpended binary in the source release - All files have apache headers - Can compile from source Minor issue there’s no need to list the copyright for abego sof

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

2016-06-06 Thread moon soo Lee
Hi, +1 (non-binding) Verified: - Signature [1] - DISCLAIMER exist - LICENSE file looks good - NOTICE file looks good - no unexpected binary files - build from sources [1] the signing key isn't available form the release area's KEYS file. Please update. Thanks, moon On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

2016-06-06 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > SystemML version 0.10.0! > > The PPMC vote thread: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00618.html > > And the result: > > https://