Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

+1 (some issues as pointed out above, but we can fix those in the next release) On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Let me reiterate my +1 (binding) vote here... > > Anyone else willing to review the release ? > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Let me reiterate my +1 (binding) vote here... Anyone else willing to review the release ? On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > SystemML version 0.9.0! > > The PPMC vote thread: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Thanks for the thorough review, we will definitely look into all these issues for the next release. Anyone else willing to review ? We still need at least one more vote. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) but only if LICENSE is

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Hi, +1 (binding) but only if LICENSE is fixed for next release I checked: - file contains incubating - signatures and hashed good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing bundled software [11][12] - NOTICE is OK - Several source files are missing Apache headers [7]. While they are generated