+1 (binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] DISCLAIMER file exists
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source (opendal-java) and test passed.
One suggestion here: Is it possible to pin a Rust version for a spec
Makes sense, we should use the same version to build dyn libs for all bindings.
I will start a issue to track this.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, at 17:23, Zili Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] DISCLAIMER f
Hi
+1(binding)
Here is what I checked:
- The checksums and signatures are validated.
- The LICENSE and NOTICE files look good to me.
- There is a DISCLAIMER file about incubating.
- No binary files in the source release.
@Xuanwo
I just found out the PPMC vote started yesterday. We must wait 72
h
+1(binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE files exist.
[x] NOTICE is included.
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] All source files have license headers if necessary.
Bes
> I just found out the PPMC vote started yesterday. We must wait 72
> hours even if we have more than 3 +1.
> If you want to speed up the voting process, you can invite the mentors
> to join the PPMC vote.
Thank you for the reminder. I will update our VOTE email template to align with
this behavi
