On 13 October 2011 16:29, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Right, but unless the podling changes its name on graduation it's
> still going to be relatively standard, right? .apache.org vs
> incubator.apache.org/?
Not necessarily. Some graduate as part of a TLP.
> Since I still have the script handy, sha
Right, but unless the podling changes its name on graduation it's
still going to be relatively standard, right? .apache.org vs
incubator.apache.org/?
Since I still have the script handy, shall I kick out a new
podlings.xml, with a url attribute pre-filled using the above for
current and/or gradua
On 13 October 2011 16:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
> So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the
> link is derived from the podling name? Or should the url attribute be
> default-filled for all cases?
No, the URL I referred to would only apply to *non-current* podlings.
T
So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the
link is derived from the podling name? Or should the url attribute be
default-filled for all cases?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
The graduated podling list does not make it easy to find the new home
of a project.
One has to click on the status page link and hope that the status page
has been updated with the new TLP details.
For example, Abdera does not show the new URL; ActiveMQ does.
But even if the status pages were all
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> The following podlings appear to be retired or dormant:
>
> juice - status says dormant
> kabuki - status says withdrawn
> wadi - status page has not been updated since creation as far as I can
The wadi proposal was withdrawn by its creator before any
The following podlings appear to be retired or dormant:
juice - status says dormant
kabuki - status says withdrawn
wadi - status page has not been updated since creation as far as I can
tell; no updates to SVN since end of 2005
Should their SVN directories be made read-only?
