Thanks for the clarification Roy.
On 31 October 2012 05:29, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
[generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
[generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
But regardless, you couldn't. A
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
...We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid
Hi Noah,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
Can we ship this?
it's
Hi all,
I'm the RM for the release, so I wanted to provide some context to
Noah's question. Some of this has already been mentioned on the
project's vote thread, but I'll bring it up again here to see if there
are any thoughts to help us decide if this is a blocker or not. At
this point, I'm
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de wrote:
Hi Noah,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers
Le 10/29/12 3:39 PM, Noah Slater a écrit :
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
out on the project's dev
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
On 29 October 2012 15:13, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
I'll try to be more clear next time. I'm holding the vote open
specifically because of this outstanding question, *regardless* of the
current tally. That's what I was expressing.
Understood. I suspected we were on
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de
wrote:
Hi Noah,
We're just voting on our first release, and
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
currently ongoing to remove it (and it's use) from the project
entirely...
...That will be several weeks of work (not days),
which is
Nice summary Bertrand.
On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
currently ongoing to remove it (and
Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Nice summary Bertrand.
On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
question is actually just compressed source code, is that correct?
If yes, it's just
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
some category A open source code (given the license).
+1
From your description, this is different from a compiled object file, it's
compressed source. No
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
some category A open source code (given the license).
+1
From your
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
Thanks for investigating this, Chip.
I am happy with us proceeding, but would caution us to think about
addressing or documenting this in a later release.
I'd say wait until tomorrow to see if anyone else objects then wrap up the
vote.
Let's ship this thing!
On 29 October 2012 16:21, Chip
Hey,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
Can we ship this?
Thanks,
--
NS
20 matches
Mail list logo
