Re: TLPs, Incubation, and the Board (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Beehive)

2004-05-24 Thread Nemi Singh
Hi Schmidt, I would like to actively participate on this project. I am new to this forum..Just wondering how can I start contributing to it. would you please throw some pointers. thanks a bunch, Nemi. --- Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cliff Schmidt wrote on Monday, May 17, 2004 7:30

Re: TLPs, Incubation, and the Board (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Beehive)

2004-05-21 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Noel J. Bergman wrote: I think there are some mis-understandings. Our documentation seriously lags reality (volunteers to help would be appreciated), but even so, AFAIK, you *never* needed to go to the Board before proposing entry to the Incubator. Directors might be interested, but the issue of w

RE: TLPs, Incubation, and the Board (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Beehive)

2004-05-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Cliff, > I really like the PPMC concept. So do I. I really makes things work much better with fewer rules than all of the prior approaches. > To get the most out of a PPMC, I think the Podling should, if at all > possible, know what TLP it is destined for or if it is expected to > become a TLP

TLPs, Incubation, and the Board (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Beehive)

2004-05-21 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Cliff Schmidt wrote on Monday, May 17, 2004 7:30 PM: > Noel J. Bergman wrote on Monday, May 17, 2004 6:10 PM: >>> Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects, >>> I've requested that the Board consider this proposal at their next >>> meeting. However, it is my understandi