Flavio Junqueira wrote on Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 00:21:13 +0100:
Thanks for your interest in the project. Here are my thoughts about the
points raised.
I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev
community.
I expect us to attract more developers by increasing
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:07:18 +0200:
Flavio Junqueira wrote on Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 00:21:13 +0100:
Is there anything important I'm missing?
(/me leaves this question for the rest of general@ to answer)
... as I think their answers will be more useful than mine. I'm
Hi,
Thanks for the review and followup, Daniel!
Flavio Junqueira wrote on Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 00:21:13 +0100:
Is there anything important I'm missing?
I'm happy with your report for this month (with the note, as already
raised by Daniel, that technical issues are not relevant to
graduation).
Hi Jukka, We can certainly provide the information you request. Do you want us
to update the last report or to consider it for future reports?
-Flavio
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the review and followup, Daniel!
Flavio Junqueira wrote on Wed, Mar
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote:
Hi Jukka, We can certainly provide the information you request.
Cool, thanks!
Do you want us to update the last report or to consider it for future reports?
No need to rush unless you already have the info readily
Let's leave it for the next report then, I probably have all information but
spread across sources, so I don't have it ready.
Thanks,
-Flavio
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote:
Hi Jukka, We can
Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100:
Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you aren't directly
mentoring), read the submitted report (if one exists!)
+s4-dev@
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100:
Just pick one from the list
Thanks for your interest in the project. Here are my thoughts about the points
raised.
I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev
community.
I expect us to attract more developers by increasing awareness. We have given
presentations about the project internally (at
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
And that seems understandable, however IMHO the lazer beam focus we
now have on the quarterly reports doesn't necessarily help get better
or active oversight, in fact it makes it even easier for mentors to
just pop up
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
I know that prompted me to do a similar run-through on half of your
list (I ran out of steam/time...I guess I'll start at the bottom next
time) and I simply found nothing to add, but I did do much more
overseeing by
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100:
Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you aren't directly
mentoring), read the submitted report (if one exists!) and compare it
to the previous report (for most podlings that's the one from December
[2]) and a quick browsing
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
While there was no clear single message, the overall
impression I got was that the board expects the Incubator PMC to
provide better and more active oversight on podlings.
And that seems understandable, however IMHO
Hey hey,
Jukka this is sounding so timid :). You know, I think I'll break rank
and tell you what I really think. You may want to sit down first.
You [1] did a *kick ass* job on the last report. Kick. Ass. [2]. Kapow!
As well as spending the time to look through and digest it all
beforehand
Jukka's recent email and activity are precisely what I was hoping for
when I joined the chorus of voices for new leadership.
On this thread, I have a thought or two. Of the podlings I have known,
most required very little supervision. The single largest exception
has always been getting the first
Jukka,
This sounds like a great plan to me. Providing the board with a summary
demonstrates that the IPMC has reviewed all of the podling reports and
assessed the progress of each podling. Also including the full podling
reports to the board both gives supporting evidence to the podling
Hi,
During the February board meeting there was a discussion about what
the directors would like to see in Incubator reports. The feedback we
got on this ranged from providing just an executive summary of all
Incubator activity to doing that *and* including all the podling
reports. While there
17 matches
Mail list logo
