On 3 June 2011 10:20, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> These days we record exactly what is in the first line of the ICLA: Sidney
>> Phillip Rhodes. Both in the iclas.txt and the name of the document.
Yes, originally the document name
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> These days we record exactly what is in the first line of the ICLA: Sidney
> Phillip Rhodes. Both in the iclas.txt and the name of the document.
I'll note that we maintain two fields. One as Craig describes, and a
second that
Hi Sebb,
These days we record exactly what is in the first line of the ICLA:
Sidney Phillip Rhodes. Both in the iclas.txt and the name of the
document.
Craig
On Jun 2, 2011, at 6:59 PM, sebb wrote:
On 3 June 2011 02:44, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb wrote
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> The CLA lists the name as "Sidney Philip Rhodes" - not sure why Philip
> was omitted from the file that records the CLAs.
> It's signed: "Philip Rhodes".
>
Yep, that would be me. Sidney is my first name, but since *both* of my
grandfathers, and my
On 3 June 2011 02:44, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Specifically, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
>>
>> but again I don't see your name
>>
>>
> Actually, it is there. It's just under my first name "Sidney" instead
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> Specifically, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
>
> but again I don't see your name
>
>
Actually, it is there. It's just under my first name "Sidney" instead of my
middle name, which I usually go by. :-)
That is, a
That isn't an impediment to Philip adding his name into the list of initial
committers though. It just means he has to fax a CLA before he can get an id
right?
Alasdair Nottingham
On 3 Jun 2011, at 02:00, sebb wrote:
> Specifically, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unl
Specifically, here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
but again I don't see your name
On 3 June 2011 01:59, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Philip,
>
> please check here - http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>
> I don't think i see your name there
>
> -- dims
>
> On
Philip,
please check here - http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
I don't think i see your name there
-- dims
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> Hmmm... I was never a committer, somebody else applied that patch... but I
> was asked to fax in a CLA. Not sure if tha
Hmmm... I was never a committer, somebody else applied that patch... but I
was asked to fax in a CLA. Not sure if that helps or not. :-)
Phil
On Jun 2, 2011 8:25 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Phillip Rhodes
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jim Jagielski
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Under the list of proposed committers, yes.
>> --
>
> Awesome. I should already have a CLA on file, from when I made a
> contribution to Roller Weblogger a few years back. That was,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> Under the list of proposed committers, yes.
> --
Awesome. I should already have a CLA on file, from when I made a
contribution to Roller Weblogger a few years back. That was, however, some
time ago. Is there a way to confirm that my CL
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:37:47PM -0400, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> For those of us who are interested in volunteering to support the new Apache
> OpenOffice podling,
> what is the correct procedure to state such interest? Should one add
> themselves to the
> wiki version of the proposal under "comm
On Jun 2, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
For those of us who are interested in volunteering to support the
new Apache
OpenOffice podling,
what is the correct procedure to state such interest? Should one add
themselves to the
wiki version of the proposal under "committers?" Or "other?
For those of us who are interested in volunteering to support the new Apache
OpenOffice podling,
what is the correct procedure to state such interest? Should one add
themselves to the
wiki version of the proposal under "committers?" Or "other?"
Thanks,
Phillip
15 matches
Mail list logo
