I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well.
> Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if
> the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER
> should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information.
Best,
OK. My major intention is to sync the discussion to the list. If "lazy
consensus" is too eager to use, I'm OK to make it clear that it's still
encouraged for everyone on the list to give more inputs :D
Best,
tison.
sebb 于2024年5月25日周六 16:26写道：
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
> >
On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
>
> A lazy consensus is met at [1].
Sorry, but I don't think it is correct to to use that designation here.
I don't think the discussion has been open long enough to say that
consensus has been achieved, nor was there an explicit call for
opinions.
All
A lazy consensus is met at [1]. I support Justin's opinion that "we were
not too prescriptive on the exact wording". But this patch can be used as a
reference for a good starting point for other podlings.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/incubator-horaedb/pull/1535#issuecomment-2130634831
Best,
A concrete proposal for the HoraeDB situation:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-horaedb/pull/1535
Best,
tison.
tison 于2024年5月24日周五 08:03写道：
> Hi,
>
> This is a discussed topic at [1].
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kxvdkrf8g8yr6hww1n08r21xdy67y4ok
>
> I agree on the '(Incubating)'
Hi,
This is a discussed topic at [1].
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kxvdkrf8g8yr6hww1n08r21xdy67y4ok
I agree on the '(Incubating)' in the repo description part.
For the disclaimer part, [1] first had:
> I would be for requiring the incubator disclaimer text in the project's
> README.
Hi,
> Whilst the DISCLAIMER file is helpful, and having '(Incubating)' in
> the repo description/About, neither of these are all that obvious.
Yep, that should be done.
> It seems to me that the repo README should also contain the Incubator
> disclaimer, as is done on website pages.
That is
Now that 'incubator' is no longer required as part of Git repo names,
the question arises: what notification is required to ensure users are
aware of the status?
Whilst the DISCLAIMER file is helpful, and having '(Incubating)' in
the repo description/About, neither of these are all that obvious.
