Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a
number of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
The code contributions have been attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a number
of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
The code contributions have been attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6217
I've committed the IP Clearance form to the Incubator website
Please note that the aries-private mailing list is subscription
moderated and currently restricted to mentors or ASF *members* until
the community is bootstrapped. So please do not subscribe unless you
fall into one of those two categories.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:22, Kevan Miller
On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Please note that the aries-private mailing list is subscription
moderated and currently restricted to mentors or ASF *members* until
the community is bootstrapped. So please do not subscribe unless you
fall into one of those two categories.
The Geronimo PMC has voted to donate the blueprint implementation to
aries, so I've gone ahead and moved the code to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/blueprint/
I guess we need to discuss how we want to organized the svn tree /
build, and until the mailing lists are set up, we
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally not
done for podlings?
Cheers,
David
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing
Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
The Geronimo PMC has voted to donate the blueprint implementation to
aries, so I've gone ahead and moved the code to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/blueprint/
I guess we need to discuss how we want to organized the svn tree /
build
Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed,
but this is another problem we can address later.
Yes, I was thinking
parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
Sounds good to me. We need to set up the trunk/tags/branches first I
think.
I don't seem to have the permissions to create these. Could someone create
them or give me enough permissions so I could?
Cheers,
David
I have only set up svn write access to the four mentors. I was
planning on checking with the other ones the right wau to go forward.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 16:05, David Bosschaert
david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
Sounds good to me. We need to set
from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed,
but this is another problem we can address later.
Personally, I'd
in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed
Aries build with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having
:
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build
with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk
, David Bosschaert
david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with
a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide
in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed
On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Ok, let's put everything in standby until those lists are created.
OK, the mailing lists have been created. Thanks Brett Porter!
aries-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
aries-user-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
My +1 ... sorry
On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
that was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought forward to the Apache Geronimo
to Geronimo so is this going to be a new
sub-project of Geronimo and if so then shouldn't this just be a simple
graduation as a sub-project vote?
...ant
I had sent a note to the Incubator PMC about the plan and hadn't
received this as an option. I spect this is basically what we're
doing
On Dec 11, 2007 2:15 PM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
The proposal mentions continuing
+1
On 11/12/2007, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here
it theres two scenarios here:
1) CXF is incubating (i.e. no current PMC) and none of the Yoko
developers are interested in moving with the portion of code thats
going there. IMO its only going to get harder to complete this as time
goes by so better off getting it done asap.
2) With Geronimo even
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
CXF Discussion / Vote: http://tinyurl.com/yr6wet
I guess the question is has the appropriate incubator due-dilligence
been completed on the Yoko code
. Since
Yoko will be moved to CXF and Geronimo, it is now the responsibility
PMCs of those two projects to make sure that it was done to their
satisfaction since responsibility has now shifted from the Incubator
PMC to CXF and Geronimo PMCs.
More specifically this should be treated code
+1
Bill
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below is a proposal
Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com
interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
CXF Discussion / Vote: http
://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
CXF Discussion / Vote: http://tinyurl.com/yr6wet
I guess the question is has the appropriate incubator due-dilligence
been
+1
Craig
On Dec 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[ ] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache
Geronimo and CXF respectively
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not approve of the move (please provide rationale
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http
+1
--kevan
On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Noel or anyone,
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
Ismael should also submit a CCLA (see the same page) if one will be
necessary for Intalio employees to satisfy their obligations under the terms
of their
Noel,
Thanks. We will review and provide signed documents ASAP.
-Ismael
On 2/15/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
Ismael should also
we have a clear read on whether we want foreign code
committed to ASF repositories before IP vettage? [Noel?]
My bad; I was confused and thinking XBean was coming in as
a podling and not as a direct import to Geronimo. So
my objections were ill-founded and should be ignored, particularly
since
way back when
Geronimo started as a preventative measure. Is it possible to do a
quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
If so, *after* the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
has been created, we can import
way back when
Geronimo started as a preventative measure. Is it possible to do a
quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
See the list at http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
The top table is the list
I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477view=rev
If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
Wednesday February 15th.
-dain
On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's
Hi all,
I'm afraid I don't have time for a drawn-out discussion about any of this,
especially
not a heated one, but a few people asked me to write this down anyway. This
message is
directed primarily at the Geronimo PMC.
I've just reviewed the traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's
incubation?? After all, it was one of the cornerstones to get
Should have sent this email a much earlier as we voted quite some
time ago. Anyway,
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
The Geronimo project has voted to be the sponsor of the OpenEJB
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE revise whatever template you guys are copying from:
New
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into
the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE
On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:07 PM, David Crossley wrote:
While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo
Status report in its Project website section refers to an
old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/
I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo
While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo
Status report in its Project website section refers to an
old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/
I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo
incubation. These days incubating projects have
On Thursday 16 June 2005 09:43, David Blevins wrote:
You should ask on the user@geronimo.apache.org list. I would have
forwarded your message myself, but your confidentiality statement prevents
me from legally doing so :)
Really? ;o) How about this message ??
Niclas
Confidentiality
Hai All
The following command is possible to deploy local. But I am
expecting remote deployment how can I do. Where can I mention the
Hostname and what is the argument. Option. Anyone has idea please advice
to me
Thanks in Advance
Kumar
deployer.jar --user system --password
Dear Incubators,
just FYI, when you click on the Geronimo link on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html,
the redirect is wrong (I wanted to add a bugzilla
entry, but I didn't find the Incubator product).
-- Andreas
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
when you click on the Geronimo link on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html,
the redirect is wrong
Fixed. That should not have been effected by the redirect, but was.
--- Noel
Bhanu,
The mailing lists can be found in
http://geronimo.apache.org/mail-lists.html
I'll fix the wiki.
Regards,
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Bhanu Vasireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Geronimo J2EE project
I'm happy to announce that the board today approved the proposal to
make the Geronimo project a top-level Apache project.
We'll be discussing the next steps later, but I wanted everyone to hear
the good news here first.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m
Hip, Hip, Hoay!!!
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 18:07, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'm happy to announce that the board today approved the proposal to
make the Geronimo project a top-level Apache project.
We'll be discussing the next steps later, but I wanted everyone to hear
the good news here
+1
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:57:39PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems
Schmidt
Leo Simons
Davanum Srinivas
James Strachan *
Dain Sundstrom
No objections have been expressed. The Geronimo PPMC should prepare and
present to the Board a request for TLP status.
--- Noel
* Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
PMC archives
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
Jacek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
...
please vote :
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
+1
I want to add that I've seen the Geronimo PPMC very responsive and
collaborative on issue managment, and thus
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[ X ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
it's about time :-D
- Leo Simons
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
+1
Many thanks to Geronimo's resident nudniks Geir and Noel.
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Incubator and recommend as top
+1 from me.
-- dims
On Thu, 20 May 2004 22:57:39 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative
On May 21, 2004, at 6:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
Many thanks to Geronimo's resident nudniks Geir and Noel.
Nah. this is all possible and only possible because of the work and
dedication of the geronimo community.
geir
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
-dain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks to Geronimo for the effort you all went through in applying
some of the new Incubator concepts, such as the PPMC. You helped
lead a path for the rest of us.
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
+1
Many thanks for all the assistance from the Apache veterans.
David Jencks
+1. And very enthusiastic at that.
An absolutely heroic effort!
Cheers,
Berin
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems both internal and external, formed a functioning
group of committers
I believe the Geronimo project has satisfied the requirements
of the Apache Incubation process
That would also be my impression from active observation and discussion with
the project since its inception. I know that others have closely observed
Geronimo's progress, and we'll see
+ 1 (of course)
On May 20, 2004, at 10:57 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems both
Status report from the Geronimo PPMC
* The project status file (/home/cvs/incubator-geronimo/STATUS)
is up to date.
* Geir Magnusson is preparing a response to the JBoss letter for
approval by the ASF Board. It concludes that there is no validity
Just wondering since we already have Tomcat why bother to develop Geronimo, what is
the difference between these two.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Zhang, Larry (L.) said:
ZLLJust wondering since we already have Tomcat why bother to develop Geronimo, what
is the difference between these two.
Tomcat only addresses Servlet and JSP specs which is only a subset
of the J2EE specs. Geronimo addresses the full set
as a developer, please find my resume attached.
Cheers,
--Octavian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apologies for the last minute update.
Status report for the Incubator Geronimo Project
* is the STATUS file up to date? (also post link)
Yes
/home/cvs/incubator/site/projects/geronimo.cwiki
* any legal, cross-project or personal issues
that still need to be addressed?
A serious legal issue
whenever Geronimo leaves the incubator - so thats an ideal time to have
the vote. Also having the vote on the geronimo-dev mail list, where
most of the geronimo community hangs out is probably a good idea.
I don't really care at this
point, except to note that if we do get an objection regarding
what I was thinking.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F9EG)E=\$\!FFEI+F-O;0\`\`);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
BL 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
BL accountable for their decision.
BL
BL+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We are
Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
BL 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
BL accountable for their decision.
BL
BL+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique
On 12/2/03 10:37 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on
Geronimo was an Apache was he not? So it definitley seems odd that we
can name our whole organization after the people of Geronimo but not
Geronimo himself (yes, I know the name came from a patchy server, but
that's not obvious to anyone most of the time).
I understand that Andy Oliver
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whether you
think planets have geography), and possibly Avalon
Ted Leung wrote:
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whether you
think planets have geography),
Roy made a comment that a condition for leaving the incubator is that
the
name be changed. I hadn't heard that before, but those are two
incompatible
views.
I said that the condition was that it would be reconsidered; basically,
that any comments to the effect that it is now too late or the
Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roy made a comment that a condition for leaving the incubator is that
the name be changed. I hadn't heard that before
I said that the condition was that it would be reconsidered
Sorry to misunderstand. Thanks for the clarification.
---
On 12/1/03 12:16 AM, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:10:16PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
...
Appropriating the name Geronimo for our uses will cause, and has
caused, controversy.
I believe the only controversy has been from people who state that the
name
Sam Ruby wrote:
The inevitable result of these two factors is an interminable discussion
on the naming of a project.
IMHO, the right answer is *not* to buck this up to the incubator PMC, or
to members, or *gasp* to the board. A much better approach would be:
1) Have the incubator PMC
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Despite this, I like Geronimo as a name. However, I think it'd be a poor
choice for two reasons previously noted: other software products already
using that name, and the *potential* it has to cause quite a bit of
trouble. It's really not that hard
Sam Ruby wrote:
...
1) Have the incubator PMC identify a clear set of constraints that apply
to *all* names. Vote on them, document them, and move on.
Right. What is our policy?
ATM here is our rule:
Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and
check
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
of the following choices:
[ ] - Let them keep Geronimo as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision
I'm changing my vote, not because I don't believe in my earlier
thoughts, but becausewe are wasting so much time and energy on something
that should be much simpler.
This gets my vote for the most unprincipled vote in this whole thread.
Andreas
the name
Geronimo, establish a PPMC and have the concerned individuals make their
case to the people who are empowered to make that decision.
I very much like the government model that the ASF board operates on.
It does not meddle in PMC decisions. If the board does not like the way
some
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
