Ignoring other parts of the thread,
I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF
releases at an infrastructure level.
Both in terms of the distributions going into
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ and the maven2 incubator
repository being closed down and merged into the
I guess, i am not in favor of blurring the lines. Is this a vote?
thanks,
-- dims
On 2/21/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignoring other parts of the thread,
I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF
releases at an infrastructure level.
Both in terms of the
On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/20/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The associated PMC would be the Incubator, and you might notice
that there
is not an incubator/ directory under those locations.
As I understand it, the primary issue is that there
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The question is whether or not an entity which is not an
official ASF project (a podling) can release code that is
an official release. IMO, the answer is NO and that is
why the Incubator is, in fact, the releasing entity. So
YES, it is official since the Incubator said
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The question is whether or not an entity which is not an
official ASF project (a podling) can release code that is
an official release. IMO, the answer is NO
SO ... anything the podling wants to consider for release belongs in
incubator.a.o/dev/dist/podling/ (or
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated PMC's public distribution area under
http://www.apache.org/dist/
The second must there in that
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated PMC's public distribution area under
At various times, various people have stated various rather
incongruent descriptions of what has to be done when a podling
performs a release
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form
Roy,
At various times, various people have stated various rather
incongruent descriptions of what has to be done when a podling
performs a release
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated
On 2/20/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The associated PMC would be the Incubator, and you might notice that there
is not an incubator/ directory under those locations.
As I understand it, the primary issue is that there has been a lot of
emphasis to say that Incubator releases are
On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In other words, we agree there is probably an export issue to resolve,
however /dist/incubator/ does not exist for a reason, and it would be
helpful if you ran changes to the incubator past the incubator PMC
before confusing our podlings
11 matches
Mail list logo