The VXQuery report is available now.
Apologies for the delay,
Till
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:28:19 -0500
Von: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Missing reports due NOW
Missing:
Imperius
The vote has passed with 20 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 binding:
Matthias Wessendorf
Leo Simons
Ant Elder
Upayavira
Dave
Santiago Gala
Sylvain Wallez
Martijn Dashorst
Niclas Hedhman
Davanum Srinivas
Daniel Kulp
Felix Meschberger
Luciano Resende
Bertrand Delacretaz
Alan D. Cabrera
+1 non
Hi,
for the Apache MyFaces subproject Trinidad we got a new contribution:
== Adonis Raul Raduca (ICLA on file) contributed a new skin, which is
basically a look-and-file
(a bunch of CSS selectors and some new images). The code has been
uploaded to TRINIDAD-1689.
Question is: Do we need a
On Jan 17, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Missing:
Imperius
Subversion
Thrift
VXQuery
These were due middle of last week, and are still not present.
Imperius report was created this morning and is on the wiki, now.
--kevan
Greetings,
The Cassandra community has successfully voted for graduation[1]. Before
calling for a recommendation vote, I'd like to see if anyone here has
any concerns or objections, or has any feedback on the draft resolution.
Regards,
[1]
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
...There was another thread started on cassandra-private (by a
mentor), where the mentors voted. I don't know if that is archived, or
who would have access, but I'm sure that either way they'll sound off
here
Cool -
Kevan,
Time to restart/finish this discussion.
I agree. Seems that things have cooled off a bit.
Personally, I'd have been happy to see this move forward either way
1) IP clearance with implementation work in Commons
This works only if we're dealing with a CODEBASE and an existing ASF
The Incubator appears to be running smoothly, with nothing regarding Board
level attention.
Shindig, Cassandra and UIMA are all talking about graduating. Shindig was
voted on last week, with the vote closed this morning in time to try to make
the Board meeting. Cassandra, which is not reporting
On 01/18/2010 09:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Incubator appears to be running smoothly, with nothing regarding Board
level attention.
Maybe it doesn't require the boards attention, but Traffic Server would
like to resolve the TradeMark issues. Who would be able to make this call?
I downloaded the Unix files, verified signatures, spot checked some files for
accuracy and built Imperius.
I noticed that your key has not been signed by anyone, although its not a
requirement, its nice to have.
+1 to release Imperius (binding)
On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[ ] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
[ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the Incubator (rationale strongly desired!)
Per the proposal below, the mentors for this
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Missing:
Subversion
Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by
this evening. -- justin
+1
...ant
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi jnee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The Imperius community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Imperius 1.0.0.
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
Imperius is a rule-based policy
Hi All,
We have 3 binding +1 votes
Kevan Miller
Ant Elder
Matt Hogstrom
The vote passes! We will work on making the release artifacts publicly
available.
Thanks Kevan, Ant, Matt and everyone who helped us with this release!
Regards
Neeraj
~
It is hard
Yeah, the dicussion started on private as Eric mentioned and that's what
triggered the vote on d...@. We should really have re-voted the dev thread to
avoid confusion.
Anyhow, my strong opinion is that Cassandra is ready. Great community, great
contributors, dynamic and fast moving without
On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Missing:
Subversion
Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues.
Who would be able to make this call?
The relevant content is:
Y! holds several TMs for the name Traffic Server, most of which
expires soon. Our legal team has proposed two possible solutions,
the first being
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[x] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
[ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the Incubator
Amended with Subversion. It is entirely up to the Board if they wish to
accept this after-deadline addition.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 11:36
To: bo...@apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification.
Cheers,
Francis
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
[ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the
On 01/19/2010 03:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues.
Who would be able to make this call?
The relevant content is:
Y! holds several TMs for the name Traffic Server, most of which
expires soon. Our legal team has
On 01/18/2010 09:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
23 matches
Mail list logo
