On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the
objections. That being said, I'm not all that clever at
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:41 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand
On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the
Hi,
I would like to call a vote for accepting ALOIS for incubation in
the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below and on the
proposal wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AloisProposal). We
ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with Scott Deboy volunteering as
Champion and
Hi Dan,
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote:
I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache
Isis. If accepted, Isis will combine the existing open source Naked
Objects framework with a collection of sister projects, providing
I don't see anything explicit in here about relicensing from GPL to
ASL. Perhaps that was hashed out before I joined the PMC?
I'm +0 tending toward -1 without an explicit statement that the
copyright owners are known and on board with the license change.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Urs
+1, binding.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote:
Hi Dan,
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote:
I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache
Isis. If accepted, Isis
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, binding.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote:
Hi Dan,
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote:
Hi
There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement regarding the
licencing:
= Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan =
ALOIS is currently under a GPL licence. Since there are only two
contributors so far, both from the same company, there is no problem
to re-licence
OK, I read the syntax of this sideways.
+1, binding, from me.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs Lerch m...@ulerch.net wrote:
Hi
There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement regarding the
licencing:
= Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan =
ALOIS is currently
Thanks for that, Siegfried.
I'm not actually putting this to a vote, yet, because we still need to
find more mentors and a champion. If haven't yet done any cold
calling of possible would-be mentors, but if you have any suggestions
of anyone who might have the bandwidth for either role, I'd
+1 notbinding
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I read the syntax of this sideways.
+1, binding, from me.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs Lerch m...@ulerch.net wrote:
Hi
There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement
+1
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 notbinding
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I read the syntax of this sideways.
+1, binding, from me.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I
14 matches
Mail list logo
