RE: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > From: r...@databricks.com > Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 23:14:30 -0800 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > +1 (binding) > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:05 PM, James Taylor wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:05 PM, James Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > > accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Arvind > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

On 3/1/16, 5:22 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers >> > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned >>upon,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it

RE: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org] Sent: 29 February 2016 23:08 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator Hi folks, OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards Dapeng On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Thanks, Taylor! Every opinion is super important to us. Talking about the different with Storm: They have very different architecture, Gearpump is Actor-architecture streaming engine with Actor modelling almost everything. The guaranteed delivery technique is also different, Gearpump use the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Hi, > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing: > > """ > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib) > src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license > src/kudu/util (HdrHistogram-related classes): public domain >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers > > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned upon, > > because licenses may change over time, or the links may break > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Not a complaint, but an observation… The section on relationship to Apache Storm seems a little understated. The README [1] states the Netty transport is based on Storm’s transport, as well as the cgroup implementation (now that JStorm has been incorporated with Storm). The guaranteed delivery

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Hi Taylor, I don't think it is too late to chime in even though I started a vote. Sorry we passed each other. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:07 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Two ships passing in the night. ;) > > My apologies for being late to comment. > > -Taylor > > > On Mar 1,

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Two ships passing in the night. ;) My apologies for being late to comment. -Taylor > On Mar 1, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > It looks like discussion has wrapped up here so I will proceed shortly with > a VOTE thread. > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:37

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim

Re: New IPMC members Kathey Marsden and Daniel Debrunner

On 2/29/2016 5:16 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Greetings, Two Apache Members have signed up as new members of the Incubator PMC! Thanks and I accept the privilege. I am looking forward to working in the incubator. Best Kathey

[VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

Greetings, The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for at least the next 72 hours and will aim to close it Monday the 7th of March, 2016 at midnight PT. Gearpump is a flexible, efficient, and

Daniel John Debrunner accepting membership.

Thanks for adding me as a member of the IPMC. Dan.

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

It looks like discussion has wrapped up here so I will proceed shortly with a VOTE thread. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Sean Zhong wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Sean Zhong wrote: > > > sting this. > > > > > If you want a direct look

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Hi, > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned upon, > because licenses may change over time, or the links may break Correct. Also most licenses say you much include the full text of the license in your

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Hi Justin, I'm working on making the changes you suggested below. A few follow-up questions: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt > > says "StumbleUpon”. > > Sorry it was

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/1/16, 12:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these >> files in the zip referenced by the Grant. > >The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright >owner is IMO (but I

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Hi, > Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these > files in the zip referenced by the Grant. The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright owner is IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think the grant needs to be redone as it’s clear what would

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

Hello all, Voting for Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating is now closed. The release has passed. The vote breakdown is as follows: +1 Jim Jagielski(binding) +1 Justin Mclean(binding) +1 Sterling Hughes (binding) Total: +3 Thank you to all who voted. Thanks, Chris

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.1-incubating (RC1)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Feb 29, 2016, at 19:27, Hitesh Shah wrote: > > +1 - carried over from dev list (binding) > > thanks > — Hitesh > > > On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please vote on

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/1/16, 1:36 AM, "Richard Downer" wrote: >Justin, > >On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean >wrote: >>> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html >>> >> I

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Hi, > MIT/BSD: yes this is intended Thanks all good. > It does appear that the LICENSE file is insufficient in this case so I > will push to get that fixed. Yes part of why I asked, but IMO that can be fixed up after the grant. > Crypto: the name of the folder is a red herring in this case

RE: Copyright sign offs

There are two checklist items: Is the software grant received and cover the (majority?) of the code? (In which case those files should get the ASF header). This was presumably done a while ago, so just find the date from email archives to private@odfdom when the ASF secretary confirmed The

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Justin, On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean wrote: >> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html >> > I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code. [1] Was