Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >Hi! > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Alexander Bezzubov
+1 (non-binding) -- Alex On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) -C > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM moon soo Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM Timothy Chen wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tim > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin? The binary files are OKish. It's more the license I’m concerned about - do we know the history / what’s going on there? Thanks, Justin - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-25 Thread John D. Ament
Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin? I raised this on the dev list when the vote came up - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C601980662.20160322084059%40freemail.hu%3E John On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:54 PM Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) due to category B license in source. As these file are mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures good but form a non apache email - LICENSE is good - NOTICE has unneeded information in it -

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

2016-03-25 Thread Christopher Collins
Hello all, Voting for Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3 is now closed. The release has passed. The vote breakdown is as follows: +1 Jim Jagielski(binding) +1 Justin Mclean(binding) +1 Sterling Hughes (binding) Total: +3 Thank you to all who voted. Thanks, Chris

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread moon soo Lee
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM Timothy Chen wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tim > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Regards, > > Arthur > > On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Timothy Chen
+1 (non-binding) Tim On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Arthur > On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> --Chris Nauroth >> >> >> >> >> On 3/24/16,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Arthur On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote: > > >Following the discussion earlier: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Chris Nauroth
+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote: >Following the discussion earlier: >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion > >I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator >project. > >The proposal is available

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Jacques Nadeau
+1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Jeremiah Lowin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Jeremiah > > > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > > > + 1 (binding). > > > > Suresh > > > >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand

Re: AirPal to Apache? Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
I am hoping there are a few AirBnB guys on this DL, though its dependency on Presto could prohibit it becoming an Apache project… On 3/25/16, 7:38 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote: >You would need to ask AirBnB. > >John > >On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM Adunuthula, Seshu

Re: AirPal to Apache? Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread John D. Ament
You would need to ask AirBnB. John On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: > Any plans from AirBnB to bring AirPal to Apache? > > > > On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote: > > >Following the discussion earlier: > >

AirPal to Apache? Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
Any plans from AirBnB to bring AirPal to Apache? On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote: >Following the discussion earlier: >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion > >I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator >project. > >The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Jeremiah Lowin
+1 (non-binding) Jeremiah > On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > + 1 (binding). > > Suresh > >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand >> wrote: >> >> Following the discussion earlier: >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (binding). Suresh > On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > a new Incubator project. > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid > [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (binding). Suresh > On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand > wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier: >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project. > > The proposal is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Max > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > — HItesh > > > > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-25 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here. Jacopo Cappellato On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The Apache FreeMarker community has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. PPMC Vote Call:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
+1 (non-binding) Max On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > +1 (binding) > > — HItesh > > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand > wrote: > > > Following the discussion earlier: > >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Hitesh Shah
+1 (binding) — HItesh On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand wrote: > Following the discussion earlier: >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project. > > The proposal is available