+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Uma
On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik"
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
>and
+1 (non-binding)
--
Alex
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding) -C
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM moon soo Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM Timothy Chen wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer
> >
Hi,
> Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
The binary files are OKish. It's more the license I’m concerned about - do we
know the history / what’s going on there?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
I raised this on the dev list when the vote came up -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C601980662.20160322084059%40freemail.hu%3E
John
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:54 PM Justin
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to category B license in source. As these file are mention in
NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures good but form a non apache email
- LICENSE is good
- NOTICE has unneeded information in it
-
Hello all,
Voting for Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3 is now closed. The
release has passed. The vote breakdown is as follows:
+1 Jim Jagielski(binding)
+1 Justin Mclean(binding)
+1 Sterling Hughes (binding)
Total: +3
Thank you to all who voted.
Thanks,
Chris
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM Timothy Chen wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer
> wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Arthur
> > On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris
+1 (non-binding)
Tim
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Arthur
> On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/24/16,
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Arthur
On Mar 25, 2016 9:27 AM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote:
>
> >Following the discussion earlier:
> >
+1 (binding)
--Chris Nauroth
On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote:
>Following the discussion earlier:
>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
>I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator
>project.
>
>The proposal is available
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Jeremiah Lowin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> >
> > + 1 (binding).
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
I am hoping there are a few AirBnB guys on this DL, though its dependency
on Presto could prohibit it becoming an Apache project…
On 3/25/16, 7:38 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
>You would need to ask AirBnB.
>
>John
>
>On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM Adunuthula, Seshu
You would need to ask AirBnB.
John
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM Adunuthula, Seshu
wrote:
> Any plans from AirBnB to bring AirPal to Apache?
>
>
>
> On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote:
>
> >Following the discussion earlier:
> >
Any plans from AirBnB to bring AirPal to Apache?
On 3/24/16, 8:00 PM, "Siddharth Anand" wrote:
>Following the discussion earlier:
>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
>I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator
>project.
>
>The
+1 (non-binding)
Jeremiah
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> + 1 (binding).
>
> Suresh
>
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
>> wrote:
>>
>> Following the discussion earlier:
>>
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as
> a new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid
> [ ] -1 Do
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
> wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier:
>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Max
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > — HItesh
> >
> > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Apache FreeMarker community has
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
+1 (non-binding)
Max
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> — HItesh
>
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
> wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion earlier:
> >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
+1 (binding)
— HItesh
On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available
23 matches
Mail list logo