Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc2

2023-11-07 Thread Riley Kuttruff
This is what I've found: Our code does not explicitly install or use chardet; however, some of the dependencies our code does install/use have chardet as a dependency and may be using it. I believe I've identified all the dependencies resulting in chardet being installed and am working to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc2

2023-11-06 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi Justin, I checked more thoroughly and that requirements file doesn't appear to be used anywhere so I've deleted it. However, I did also check the docker images built from this release candidate and found chardet installed in a number of them (not explicitly, but in the installation process

[VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2022-12-22 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. SDAP community vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2023-01-02 Thread Riley Kuttruff
release. If a few IPMC members > > surface several issues this time around, the second release should be > > much cleaner. > > > > Julian > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: &g

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2023-01-05 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello everyone, The vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2 has failed to pass. +1 votes: - Julian Hyde - John D. Ament -1 votes: - Justin Mclean Other votes: - Larry McCay (-0) Thank you everyone for your feedback. The SDAP team has addressed the issues at hand and is currently

[VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc3

2023-01-10 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc3. The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc3. We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. SDAP community thread

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2023-01-03 Thread Riley Kuttruff
sure, you don't intend to only license the release > branch's source as ASL, right? > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:28 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > Thank you for the notes. > > > > I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > > link

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2023-01-03 Thread Riley Kuttruff
If using DISCLAIMER-WIP, would we need to switch to that for all our release artifacts? As far as I can see, the issues found in this thread that would necessitate using the WIP disclaimer are present in 2 of the 3 artifacts. Should the other artifact keep the standard DISCLAIMER? On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

2022-12-23 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello, In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to last to a week from now. Thank you, Riley On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc2. >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc3

2023-01-18 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello everyone, The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes. Binding +1 votes: - Julian Hyde - Justin McLean - Gang Li Binding -1 votes: There were no -1 votes Thank you everyone for your feedback and help with getting SDAP through to its first official release. The SDAP team will take the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.1.0-rc0

2023-05-10 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hello, This vote has been open for about 9 days and has so far received one binding vote from our project mentor. We will need an additional 2 binding votes to be able to close this thread. Thank you, Riley On 2023/05/01 17:20:32 Nga Chung wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > This is a call for

Re: [Podlings]Please check the checksum and signature link

2023-05-14 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi Calvin, Thanks for pointing that out. I'll get it addressed for the next vote threads. -Riley On 2023/05/15 05:19:56 Calvin Kirs wrote: > Hi Podlings, > > Note that the links to the checksum and signature must not be to the > mirror selector, but must be direct to downloads.apache.org. >

Re: [Podlings]Please check the checksum and signature link

2023-05-14 Thread Riley Kuttruff
I apologize, but which is the incorrect link? Is it the dist.apache.org one? On 2023/05/15 05:19:56 Calvin Kirs wrote: > Hi Podlings, > > Note that the links to the checksum and signature must not be to the > mirror selector, but must be direct to downloads.apache.org. > > I noticed that

Re: [Podlings]Please check the checksum and signature link

2023-05-15 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Ah, ok. Thank you. We'll be updating the download page soon and I'll be sure to include this change. -Riley On 2023/05/15 05:54:37 Calvin Kirs wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:24 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > Hi Calvin, > > > > Thanks for pointing that

Re: AW: [QUESTION] Handling of licensing issues for dependencies of dependencies

2024-01-10 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Thanks Justin, Chris! I've been experimenting with trying to avoid the installation of the GPL package, and for the main dependency, it seems to not be causing any loss of functionality, though we will have to tweak how we install that dependency. As I understand it, though, it would be

[QUESTION] Handling of licensing issues for dependencies of dependencies

2024-01-09 Thread Riley Kuttruff
I was performing a more thorough check of our dependencies in preparation of opening graduation discussions with the Incubator PMC and found at least one package that, while not directly used in the code, is installed as a dependency of multiple top-level dependencies that is LGPL licensed. The

Re: Registering a release

2024-03-21 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi Justin, > You might want to remove those old releases there, as they are automatically > archived here: > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/sdap/ Would that affect the closer.lua download links on our website? -Riley On 2024/03/20 23:39:49 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > In SDAPs

[VOTE] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-03-15 Thread Riley Kuttruff
- Edward M Armstrong - Nga Thien Chung - Thomas Cram - Frank Greguska - Thomas Huang - Julian Hyde - Joseph C. Jacob - Jason Kang - Riley Kuttruff - Thomas G Loubrieu - Kevin Marlis - Stepheny Perez - Wai Linn Phyo NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nga Thien Chung be app

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc4

2024-03-11 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi Xuanwo, Thank you for finding these missing license headers, I've opened a PR to address this for our next release. Did you use an automated tool to find these? That would be helpful for evaluating and preparing future release candidates. Thanks, Riley On 2024/03/11 02:45:50 Xuanwo wrote: >

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache SDAP (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-04-04 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi all, The vote has passed with 4 binding +1 PMC votes and no other votes. - Julian Hyde - Zili Chen (tison) - PJ Fanning - Yonglun Zhang With these votes and the support from the IPMC in our graduation DISCUSS thread [1], I'll be closing this vote now and presenting our TLP resolution to the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-03-27 Thread Riley Kuttruff
Hi everyone, Just a quick reminder that this vote is still open. Thanks, Riley On 2024/03/15 22:18:34 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the positive feedback we received in the DISCUSS thread [1], > we would like to open the official VOTE to graduate now. > > Be

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-02-22 Thread Riley Kuttruff
ph C. Jacob - Jason Kang - Riley Kuttruff - Thomas G Loubrieu - Kevin Marlis - Stepheny Perez - Wai Linn Phyo NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nga Thien Chung be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache SDAP, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of th

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-02-23 Thread Riley Kuttruff
2nrycqcw > > On 2024/02/22 18:01:31 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Apache SDAP joined Incubator in October 2017. In the time since, we've > > made significant progress towards maturing our community and our > > project and adopting the Apache Way. &

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-02-23 Thread Riley Kuttruff
g lists and the community seems in a pretty good > > state. > > > > As a matter of interest, are you still looking at completing the v1.2.0 > > release [1]? If so, I could have a look at the RC over the weekend. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-02-28 Thread Riley Kuttruff
are extremely grateful! On 2024/02/28 05:35:57 Calvin Kirs wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:43 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > Thank you very much. We have actually found an issue with that release (GPL > > licensed dependency) and have been working on preparing another r

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-02-29 Thread Riley Kuttruff
tion adequately. If not, let me know. -Riley On 2024/02/29 05:53:44 Xuanwo wrote: > Hi, Riley Kuttruff > > Thank you very much to the SDAP PPMC for maintaining this project! > > Three releases (one ongoing) in seven years seems a bit sparse from my > perspective. Is there a re