Stepping down as Livy and Spot Mentor

I have no had enough time to spend as the livy and spot mentor. I would like to step down at this time. Brock Brock Noland | Chief Architect phData E : br...@phdata.io ( https://www.phdata.io/ ) phData Voted 2019 Best Places to Work ( https://phdatawebinar.com/best-places-to-work-2019

Please grant BrockDNoland write access to the wiki

Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2

[x] +1 Approve the release On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Bharath Vissapragada wrote: > Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2 has passed a PPMC vote; this email is a > call for an IPMC vote. > > The PPMC voting thread is at: > > < >

Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

+1 On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 as well. > > Regards > JB > > On Aug 23, 2017, 17:04, at 17:04, Marcelo Vanzin > wrote: > >Just echoing my +1 from the Livy list. > > > >On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Jerry Shao

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

/cloudera/livy/wiki > > > APis are documented within the source code as JavaDoc style > documentation > > > comments. > > > > > > = Initial Source = > > > > > > The initial source code for Livy is hosted at > > > https://github.com/cloudera/livy >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Livy Proposal for Apache Incubator

* d...@livy.incubator.apache.org (dev mailing list) > * u...@livy.incubator.apache.org (User questions) > * comm...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able > to post) > * iss...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able > t

Edit access

Can you give brocknoland edit access to the wiki?

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thursday, December 3, 2015, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

at proposal, which is on the wiki at > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and which I've > > > pasted > > > > > below. > > > > > > > > > > During the discussion period, the proposal has

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

tools''': BSD 3-clause > > > * '''libev''': BSD 2-clause > > > * '''squeasel''':MIT license > > > * '''protobuf''': BSD 3-clause > > > * '''rapidjson''': MIT > > > * '''snappy''': BSD 3-clause > > > * '''trace-viewer''': BSD 3-clause >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give every > podling that message. Delivering that message by informing podlings of your experience is completely acceptable. However, if anyone attempts to

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

efore that "Personally, ...", I wrote this line: > > "Nobody is forcing anything." > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's style so I doubt you have >>

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > IMO, I trust our PMCs and PPMCs to know whether RTC or CTR, or some > combination of both, is better suited to their community and > their project. Both processes can work great, and both can be > perfect disasters. +1. I

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Not sure how to totally grok the below... It seems to > imply, logically, that we cannot require either CTR or RTC. > So what other method is there? Certainly we need both a > Review and a Commit and one must be done before

Re: [DISCUSS] Impala incubator proposal

Same here. Happy to see this come to the ASF! On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Awesome! Glad to see this coming to the ASF :-) > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 RC2

[x] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 verified sigs, hashes, no jars, and inspected tarball. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Ryan Blue b...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, I propose RC2 to be released as official Apache Parquet 2.3.0 release. A similar vote has passed in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 RC2

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Blue b...@cloudera.com wrote: In the mean time, if you take a look at the .travis.yml file, you can see the preparation steps used to run CI jobs. That's what I usually point people

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.0.0 (incubating)

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Forwarding 1 vote from an IPMC member on the PPMC vote: +1 Brock Noland Julian Hyde, on behalf of Apache Calcite PPMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Witt (National Security Agency) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Benson Margulies (Basis Technology) bimargulies at apache dot org === Nominated Mentors === * Drew Farris (Booz Allen Hamilton) drew at apache dot org * Brock Noland (Cloudera) brock at apache dot org * Billie Rinaldi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

. Todd Lipcon and Tom White are committers to Apache Hadoop and multiple other related projects. Brock Noland is a Hive committer. === Homogenous Developers === The initial committers come from a number of companies and countries. Parquet has an active community of developers, and we

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

Yes, I think the 500MB issue was because we moved the .tar.gz files the build downloads to a directory called thirdparty as opposed to target. I made this change because downloading those files after a clean took a very long time for yokels like myself. Some of the issues would be fixed by

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

developers for the Sentry project are Brock Noland, Shreepadma Venugopalan, Prasad Mujumdar and Jarek Jarcec Cecho. Other contributors include Arvind Prabhakar and Xuefu Zhang. All engineers have deep expertise in Hadoop and various other ecosystem components. === Alignment

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: +1 (binding) On 11/6/12 10:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hello, This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now submitting for a vote for this project to be

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here. Made sense to me as a response to Not sure about the entry criteria for the GIT experiment right now, but I think it should be pretty stable - lets ask infra?

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: This seems like it might be more at home at apache-extras. That may ultimately be its fate, but building a community around these tools is worthy of

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) -- Olivier Le 20 juil. 2012 18:43, Aaron McCurry amccu...@gmail.com a écrit : I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

* Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org * Brock Noland br...@apache.org * Bruce Mitchenerbru...@apache.org * Derek Deeter ddee...@apache.org * Eric Sammeresam...@apache.org * Hari

Re: [VOTE] Accept Crunch into the Apache Incubator

and fixes and implemented extensions of Crunch. Cloudera's engineering team has since maintained the project with Josh Wills, Tom White, and Brock Noland dedicated towards its improvement. Contributors to Crunch include developers from multiple organizations, including businesses and universities

[ANNOUNCE] Apache MRUnit 0.9.0-incubating released

The Apache MRUnit team is pleased to announce the release of MRUnit 0.9.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. This is the fourth release of Apache MRUnit, a Java library that helps developers unit test Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs. The release is available here:

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

mrunit-0.9.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Wed Apr 18 13:14:43 2012 PDT using RSA key ID 8E991CC5 gpg: Good signature from Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg:          There is no indication

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting upon

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

How should so-called Weak Copyleft Licenses be handled?, including Software under the following licenses may be included in binary form within an Apache product if the inclusion is appropriately labeled. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Patrick, I think we should resolve this, but I am wondering s this a strict requirement for this release? In looking for the correct entry for JUnit I noticed hadoop-1.0.2 distributes the JUnit jar and nothing is mentioned in the NOTICE.txt. Brock On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brock Noland

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

for this. Patrick On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is +1  3  Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho -1   0 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is +1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho -1 0 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com wrote: Brock, I guess you can email this up to general@incubator.apache.org now, right? On 04

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating

Hi, On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/ There's a NOTICE.txt and NOTICE-src.txt at the top level. IMO the primary NOTICE file should be for the source. So

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating

This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting upon

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

/yvmtokdbprn5h2vl Patrick On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: I didn't see Tom's vote?  Sometimes emails don't show up in my box so I checked here as well and cannot find it? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mrunit-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAFukC

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

at 10:49 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: me/tom/chris is not sufficient? Or did I miss something? Patrick On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: Great!  Now we only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Added general to the email chain. Brock On Wed

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

Patrick On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: I didn't see Tom's vote?  Sometimes emails don't show up in my box so I checked here as well and cannot find it? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mrunit-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAFukC%3D4Gie5Yvbyp84QmY

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

17 12:10:27 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5 gpg: Good signature from Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 2847

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

Hi, Just a ping to remind people to vote. Brock On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Karthik K oss@gmail.com wrote: classifier names look good. +1  (non-binding :) ) On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

. Looks good to me. Note: the archive includes a mrunit jar file (the only jar file) 'mrunit-0.8.1-incubating-hadoop100.jar'. Might be confusing for people. Regards, Patrick On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, Just a ping to remind people to vote

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.1-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12319881 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting upon

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

a mrunit jar file (the only jar file), did you intend to do this? Typically you want to have a src only artifact, and one or more artifacts containing convenience binaries. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.1-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12319881 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting upon

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

I missed antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link: http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html As such, the vote passes with: 4 +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder, Brock Noland 0 -1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder are all members

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

Hi, On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly: Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Is there a list somewhere? I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting upon

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.5.0-incubating

The release vote has passed the PPMC: +1 from Brock Noland, Patrick Hunt, Eric Sammer, Chris Mattmann (count = 4) -1 (count = 0) Patrick and Chris are on the IPMC, so we need one more IPMC +1 VOTE to release. Cheers, Brock On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote

[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.5.0-incubating

This is the first incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.5.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316328 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. Note that we are voting