One question about this from the Spark side: have you considered giving the
project a different name so that it doesn't sound like a Spark component? Right
now "Spark Kernel" may be confused with "Spark Core" and things like that. I
don't see a lot of Apache TLPs with related names, though
pwend...@apache.org
* Andrew Xia xiajunl...@apache.org
* Reynold Xin r...@apache.org
* Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be
appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to
serve in accordance with and subject
Venkataraman shiva...@apache.org
* Patrick Wendell pwend...@apache.org
* Andrew Xia xiajunl...@apache.org
* Reynold Xin r...@apache.org
* Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be
appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to
serve
Thanks for the very quick action on this, Daniel and Jake!
Matei
On Feb 8, 2014, at 3:51 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
Let me just get some information across to podlings wondering about this
new GitHub stuff we've added, and what is supported so far:
- It is now possible to relay
Thanks for describing this, Andrew. We’ll do it as well.
Matei
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Phillips demob...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard
GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address
jclouds does
I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I’m going to open an INFRA
ticket for it.
While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull request
is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as well. I’m
watching the project on GitHub and I get an
:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Spark Project:
* Mosharaf Chowdhury mosha...@apache.org
* Jason Dai jason...@apache.org
* Tathagata Das t...@eecs.berkeley.edu
Hi Craig,
On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were
thus never added to the repo.
This is a
What I meant by this is that all code is reviewed by another committer and
merged by them. Different projects operate differently, but I believe this is
a very normal way to operate. I’ve been a committer on Apache Hadoop, one of
the most active Apache projects, since 2009, and nearly all
This is an interesting point that some people asked us about (not sure how much
it really mattered, but perhaps it did). Maybe the incubator can be re-branded
somehow as an “inbound” location or something like that. The name incubator
does makes it seem like the software is not mature, but the
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the
community tally:
+1
Matei Zaharia
Reynold Xin
Hey Patrick,
We’ve already had two approved Incubator releases and gone through those items,
so is it possible to not block the release on this status page? It seems
orthogonal to having a release.
Matei
On Jan 30, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
-1 due to the status
+1
On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.9.0.
A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC.
The tag to be voted on is v0.9.0-incubating (commit 95d28ff3):
Hi Marvin,
These are not actually files compiled from our source code, but third-party
dependencies that are not published to Maven. SBT is a Scala-based build tool
where you need that JAR to run. Where exactly is the policy on including these
kinds of JARs?
The reason we went with them is
Hi Marvin,
These are not actually files compiled from our source code, but third-party
dependencies that are not published to Maven. SBT is a Scala-based build tool
where you need that JAR to run. Where exactly is the policy on including these
kinds of JARs?
The reason we went with them is
+1
Matei
On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Spark in Apache.
The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit
Williams*
Arvind Prabhakar*
Matt Franklin*
Matei Zaharia
Andy Konwinski
+0.9
Marvin Humphrey
* -indicates IPMC
I'll go ahead and get the JIRA tickets filed for email/issue tracking/Git,
and then work with the community to get them moving on' over. Thanks for
VOTE'ing
JIRA deployment for issue tracking. We will
migrate to the Apache JIRA.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK
== Initial Committers ==
* Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org
* Ankur Dave ankurd...@gmail.com
* Tathagata Das t...@eecs.berkeley.edu
* Haoyuan Li haoy...@cs.berkeley.edu
* Josh
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X.
Matei
On Dec 11, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for
Mesos in Apache.
The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating
Thanks for taking a look, Matthias! It's very much appreciated.
Matei
On May 8, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
not that I want to (immediately) become a mentor here, but I am happy
to oversee future release votes,
and see if the community needs some other guidance etc.
Thanks for taking a look, Tom! Is there anyone else from the IPMC who could
take a bit of time to check this over and vote?
Matei
On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Tom White wrote:
+1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and
svn tag all look correct.
Tom
On Thu, Apr
Thanks for taking a look, Tom! Is there anyone else from the IPMC who could
take a bit of time to check this over and vote?
Matei
On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Tom White wrote:
+1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and
svn tag all look correct.
Tom
On Thu,
Any input on this from the IPMC? We are basically blocking on mentors or IPMC
members taking another look, and would really appreciate if someone can do so.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, and it seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Mesos in Apache, but the sixth release
Any input on this from the IPMC? We are basically blocking on mentors or IPMC
members taking another look, and would really appreciate if someone can do so.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, and it seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, and it seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Mesos in Apache, but the sixth release
Hi,
We'd appreciate some input on this to continue the release process. We can make
a set of scripts to download the third-party source tarballs if that's needed.
Matei
On Apr 10, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi Sebb,
The third party libraries we included were actually all
Hi Sebb,
The third party libraries we included were actually all source code, just
compressed in tar.gz files to save space. There were no JARs or binaries. Is
distributing their source code okay, or is it still better to get people to
download them elsewhere?
Matei
On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:03
Hi Henri,
I believe we got all the required documents to the ASF for the Mesos project.
What do we need to do to sign off on this?
Matei
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off
their copyright item; namely:
Thanks David, this sounds good. Things are a little slow due to the holidays,
but we'll get more of the steps done after.
Matei
On Dec 30, 2010, at 1:29 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Matei Zaharia wrote:
Thanks everyone for the positive reception! We'll get some help from Tom for
the next
Thanks everyone for taking a look at the proposal. If there are no questions,
I'll probably start a vote thread tomorrow. We're also glad to take on more
mentors at this poit if anyone is interested (we have 3 already, but others are
welcome).
Matei
On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Mohammad Nour
been using the GitHub
issue
tracker and mailing lists at Berkeley for development discussions within our
group for several months now.
== Core Developers ==
Mesos was started by three graduate students at UC Berkeley (Benjamin
Hindman,
Andy Konwinski and Matei Zaharia), who were soon joined
(Benjamin Hindman,
Andy Konwinski and Matei Zaharia), who were soon joined by
a postdoc from
the Swedish Institute of Computer Science (Ali Ghodsi).
Although started as
a research project, Mesos was always intended to solve
operational issues
with large clusters and to become an open-source project
Thanks everyone for taking a look at the proposal. If there are no questions,
I'm going to post a vote thread tomorrow. We're also happy to take on more
mentors, so let us know if you'd like to be one.
Matei
On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Thanks David for raising
on the proposal. Also, let us know if you're interested
in being a mentor.
Thanks,
Matei Zaharia, Benjamin Hindman, Andy Konwinski, and Ali Ghodsi
= Abstract =
Mesos is a cluster manager that provides resource sharing and
isolation across cluster applications.
= Proposal =
Mesos is system
35 matches
Mail list logo
