Hello;
As some of you might recall, we tried to start a new incubation project
for Beanshell, or alternatively just get it included in Apache Commons
but neither of those happened.
We (actually Pat) did the SGA paperwork and the code was effectively
relicensed under the Apache License version
Hello;
I am sad to see corinthia move outside the ASF. It looks like it's
pretty late to change that and as someone said Apache is not for
everyone. In any case I thought I'd comment:
In Apache OpenOffice we considered the same situation with GTK, and the
general consensus at the time is
+1 Pedro Giffuni
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
This is a great team!
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Dave Fisher
Inviato: Lunedì 18 Febbraio 2013 19:51
Oggetto: Re: [PROPOSAL] BeanShell join the Apache Incubator
Hi,
This does look interesting. I'd like to help and have added myself as a
project Mentor if that is alright.
at 10:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
(Sorry for crossposting for this time, please redirect
any
response only to general@incubator)
Hello;
As some advocacy related to Apache OpenOffice.org, I
asked
the beanshell.org guys to adopt the Apache License 2.
Not only did
(Sorry for crossposting for this time, please redirect any
response only to general@incubator)
Hello;
As some advocacy related to Apache OpenOffice.org, I asked
the beanshell.org guys to adopt the Apache License 2.
Not only did Patrick Niemeyer and Daniel Leuck agree to this,
they were willing
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I like the Apache license and I think having a really free alternative
is good for everyone, as much as clang vs gcc and linux vs FreeBSD.
Apache is also a good fit for OO technologically and I think the
incubation process will end up
