consensus.
Hen
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new committers.
>
> While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we
> do have best practices
voted +1, the guy seemed to be participating,
granted still at a nascent level.
I do think it would be good if we had more solidified processes for voting
in committers. I agree with Craig's note, voting in a committer shouldn't
be lazy consensus. Maybe we want to incubator guides with some
icy w.r.t. voting new committers.
>
> While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we do
> have best practices documented in
> http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html that explicitly calls for
> consensus approval of at least three positive votes and
Hi
It sounds good to me. It's a good idea.
Regards
JB
On Nov 3, 2017, 18:34, at 18:34, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new
>committers.
>
>While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new commi
I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new committers.
While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we do
have best practices documented in http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
that explicitly calls for consensus approval of at least three
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
The answer I got on members@ is that [1] is not a policy document and
therefore a vote as to whether to make someone a committer defaults to
majority rules unless the TLP has voted otherwise, and a -1 vote is not a
veto unless
Hi,
This was already discussed on members@ but others in my TLP community are
still not satisfied and want a more public discussion.
I think the main question is whether [1] is a policy document and
therefore satisfies the stated otherwise clause in this document [2].
The answer I got on
.
That said, the original committee should be voting in new committers just like
other projects do, and those commit bits should be granted based on merit.
You can certainly include 'plays by the rules' and 'debates code not coders'
and other basic civilized parts of participating in a project
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And people in general shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Sorry about that. My bad :(.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 15:46 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And people in general shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Sorry about that. My bad :(.
Mine too; and as the originator of the thread in public my apologies to
Hani.
10 matches
Mail list logo
