Re: Cannot Access Bugzilla

Tory Stephen Toupin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IE reports page cannot be displayed (no further messages). I tried telnetting > to port 80 and got connection refused (web server down, maybe?). It seems someone deleted the RC script initializing the HTTPd server, and after the multiple reboot

Cannot Access Bugzilla

IE reports page cannot be displayed (no further messages).  I tried telnetting to port 80 and got connection refused (web server down, maybe?).

Re: [PATCH] Fix for race condition in SimplePool, fixes bug#728

Lindsay Patten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [The bug site is down] Whops... Sorry, we were installing the new Disk Array (280 Gigs, slurp :) and the new Backup Unit... Pier -- Pier P. Fumagalli

[PATCH] Fix for race condition in SimplePool, fixes bug#728

[The bug site is down] I understand the real problem now and here are new diffs for Bug 728. The problem was that in trying to minimize the amount of code in the synchronized blocks a race condition was created. The assignment and reading of the array values HAS to be part of the synchronized bl

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way > > for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which > > is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are > > I suspect that

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IANAL, nor do I play one on TV. But I have seen quite a few good people > try to resolve what appears on the surface to be a deceptively simply > issue, and fail. Significant attempts have been made, but ea

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 11:15 27/2/01 +0100, Alex Fernández wrote: > >Probably you have a stronger case here, but I'd like to know the opinion > of the PMC on the > >subject, if they think it's worthwhile. Would you accept dual

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

on 2/27/01 4:09 PM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It ain't matter what the ASF permits as the GPL does not permit it ;) Then don't use the GPL. (round and round and round and round) -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take your pain to new levels.

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 09:26 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: >>>I suspect that that clause is not the core issue. >>> >>>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2000-August/msg00207.html >> >>I suspect intention and reality are different. > >You need to read Brian's words carefully. There is an asymmetry here

Re: [Fwd: regarding the installation problem]

on 2/27/01 3:03 PM, "Adam Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to specify the amount of memory that tomcat starts with. This has > been explained in the last two days on the tomcat user mailing list > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Have a read and follow the instructions. Sigh. Thank you for answe

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

Current information related to the license issue being discussed, and from a rather authoritative source. This points out one key distinction between the Apache Software License and the GNU Public License. The former is considered "lax", the latter is more "strict". The choice between the two i

RE: [Fwd: regarding the installation problem]

Hi, You need to specify the amount of memory that tomcat starts with. This has been explained in the last two days on the tomcat user mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Have a read and follow the instructions. Hope that helps. Regards, Adam. Adam Fowler Second year Computer Science undergra

FW: [Fwd: Tomcat distribution cooperation]

more clue train's needed... fyi, i removed the attached 1.5 megs of PDF files. if you really think you need them to answer the question let me know. -jon -- From: Raanan Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:28 AM To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subje

FW: [Fwd: regarding the installation problem]

someone care to point this guy towards the clue train? -jon -- From: naresh makwana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: regarding the installation problem SIR, MY NAME IS NARESH MAKWANA.T HAVE DONE JAVA. I HAVA DOWNLOADED BINARY AP

Re: Nominations for the Jakata PMC

Sam Ruby wrote: > [...] > [+1] Peter Donald > [+1] Diane Holt > [+1] Ted Husted > [+1] Ceki Gülcü > [+1] Geir Magnusson Jr. > [+1] Daniel F. Savarese > [+1] Jason van Zyl I've seen Ted and Ceki in action on this list, and I'm sure they will be a great fit for PMC given their involvement with guid

Re: Classloader woes

Just got weird error message - went away when I restarted: Tomcat 3.2.2 (built-in webserver) JDK 1.3 Solaris Fergus Error: 500 Location: /balls Internal Servlet Error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't happen - classname is null, who added this ? at or

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 1 released

RPMs available at : ftp://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/tomcat/ Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

For a little more lighthearted view: http://www.segfault.org/story.phtml?mode=2&id=36ff969d-0541ff00 - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

>>I suspect that that clause is not the core issue. >> >>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2000-August/msg00207.html > >I suspect intention and reality are different. You need to read Brian's words carefully. There is an asymmetry here which may not be obvious. The ASF permits its

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 12:10 28/2/01 +1100, Peter Donald wrote: >At 07:50 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way >>> for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which >>> is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are >> >>I suspect that

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 07:50 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: >> GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way >> for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which >> is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are > >I suspect that that clause is not the core issue. > >http://mail.g

Re: We need this...

+1 = I will help .-) Jon Stevens wrote: > > My god, this is *so* cool. > > > > > And a TCL clone is here... > > > > With a good quote... > >

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 06:21 27/2/01 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: >Peter Donald wrote: > >>> In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not >>> accept dual licensing. It is a responsibility of the apache members >>> foundation-wide (as they are the copyright owners). >> >>The ASF board would expect the

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 06:21 27/2/01 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: >Peter Donald wrote: >> >> In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not >> accept dual licensing. It is a responsibility of the apache members >> foundation-wide (as they are the copyright owners). > >The ASF board would expect the PMCs

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

Peter Donald wrote: > > In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not > accept dual licensing. It is a responsibility of the apache members > foundation-wide (as they are the copyright owners). The ASF board would expect the PMCs to work licensing issues. > I suspect that thi

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

At 11:15 27/2/01 +0100, Alex Fernández wrote: >Probably you have a stronger case here, but I'd like to know the opinion of the PMC on the >subject, if they think it's worthwhile. Would you accept dual (ASL/GPL)-licensed code? Why? In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

Ok, Kevin, I think your points are clear (and so are mine). Hopefully everyone will have made his/her own opinion on the subject. Probably you have a stronger case here, but I'd like to know the opinion of the PMC on the subject, if they think it's worthwhile. Would you accept dual (ASL/GPL)-li