On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > Currently, the following lists have -MU set, and really should be
> > reconsidered:
> >
> > bugs
>
> Hmmm... This is unused... I would suggest converting it to an alias to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done.
> > jakarta-commons (which should be renamed to "com
Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > Please join the alexandria project's mailing lists. Gump, Maveric, JJAR,
> > etc, are all trying to do this in one way or another.
>
> The Alexandria project with Gump, Maveric, et. al.
> are doing a great job of keeping all the builds working
>
The Alexandria project with Gump, Maveric, et. al.
are doing a great job of keeping all the builds working
with each other. It also helps with notifying projects
of changes in the API.
But there hasn't been any official documentation or requests
for target naming conventions like I just proposed
Please join the alexandria project's mailing lists. Gump, Maveric, JJAR,
etc, are all trying to do this in one way or another.
I think that the first priority is to get CJAR* working. Once we have that,
using the information provided by Gump to create standardized build files
for projects becomes
I propose that we all use a standard target convention for
all Ant based projects. This is something that helps adopters
of GNU software all over. A person who has never seen GNOME
or GCC knows they can compile it by running "./configure"
and "make all check install". These conventions make it
on 9/6/01 7:45 AM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> P.S. Perhaps the right fix here is to create a jakarta-cactus subproject.
>
> Agreed... I would kindly ask to the Jakarta-Commons people, to vote on
> making Cactus become a top-level s
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> just sent a request for vote now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
> :)
Since you're at it already, can you please also tell them that I'm going to
change the mailing list name from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? :)
Let me know...
Pier
---
- Original Message -
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
> "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You're right. The na
"Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> P.S. Perhaps the right fix here is to create a jakarta-cactus subproject.
Agreed... I would kindly ask to the Jakarta-Commons people, to vote on
making Cactus become a top-level subproject of Jakarta, we'll move from
there...
Pier
---
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're right. The name [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the voted
> name. I seem to remember that the list name was changed at the last minute
> to be cactus-user@... because there was the intention to make Cactus a root
> project in the future and a name chan
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > Things I also noticed:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> - cactus-user
>
> I don't know what this is all about... There is no archive, cactus is
> related to the "commons" project, so, it should be really a
> "commons-user@jakarta"..
It seems that the commons people got tired of seeing all the cactus related
traffic, and voted
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > library-dev
>
> There's no whatsoever traffic on that list... I don't know what's it all
> about even IF I am listed as the owner of it... Either someone claims its
> usefulness (only spam received on that list since months), or I'll just
> remove it.
Go ahead and remov
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Things I also noticed:
>
> - cactus-user
>
> I don't know what this is all about... There is no archive, cactus is
> related to the "commons" project, so, it should be really a
> "commons-user@jakarta"...
I think when it was initially voted on it
"Brian Behlendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> this didn't seem to go through yesterday
It did :)
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: lists that don't requir
15 matches
Mail list logo
