on 12/6/01 2:05 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Last time I talked to Eduardo (the spec lead for JSP) he still had never
>> written a real webapp with it.
>>
>> Lemmings!
>
> Isn't the JDK 1.4's logging API story similar?
>
> The guys did not pay that much attention to Ceki's
> Last time I talked to Eduardo (the spec lead for JSP) he still had never
> written a real webapp with it.
>
> Lemmings!
Isn't the JDK 1.4's logging API story similar?
The guys did not pay that much attention to Ceki's remarks, did they?
And in terms of logging-in-Java, Ceki is THE authority,
on 12/5/01 11:27 PM, "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a case in point, I would like to point out EJB CMP as an example of
> "design-driven" technology which may very well look really stupid in
> another few years, especially given its atrociously slow mutation rate.
> If anyone wh
There seems to be some debate about whether or not that is really the
case. At least it has Richard Monson-Haefel (the author of the O'Reilly
EJB book) and Floyd Marinescu (from TheServerSide.com) confused, from
this post to ejb-interest a couple months ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ejb-intere
