Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am in the process of tidying up the issue tracking systems used by the turbine projects. The biggest change is that we are predominantly going to use an instance of the turbine based Scarab issue tracking system (from tigris.org)

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Eade
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This instance was set up as it apparently proved difficult to gain the necessary access to maintain the Scarab instance at issues.apache.org/scarab. We already have a setup of Scarab on

Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I am looking for a reliable way to find the JVM version of installed Java. I have tried java -version but that seems to return weird strings. Reading java.version via System.getProperties looks better. Has someone a better solution or an idea? Cheers Jean-frederic -- To unsubscribe,

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has someone a better solution or an idea? Try to load a class and catch the ClassNotFoundException - properties have not been reliable so far. But then again be careful with the class you chose, Kaffe will include ThreadLocal

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This instance was set up as it apparently proved difficult to gain the necessary access to maintain the Scarab instance at issues.apache.org/scarab. We

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Eade
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry, if you had troubles accessing Nagoya, it has been most definitely my fault. The original idea to set up Scarab on Nagoya was that once some projects had the confidence of the install, all other projects would have moved as well, so, I still

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has someone a better solution or an idea? Try to load a class and catch the ClassNotFoundException - properties have not been reliable so far. But then again be careful with the class you chose,

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something like the following to check that it is at least 1.3: much simpler: Class.forName(java.util.Timer); take a look at Ant's JavaVersionHelper (in org.apache.tools.ant.util). Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 05:16, Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am in the process of tidying up the issue tracking systems used by the turbine projects. The biggest change is that we are predominantly going to use an instance of the

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something like the following to check that it is at least 1.3: much simpler: Class.forName(java.util.Timer); take a look at Ant's JavaVersionHelper (in org.apache.tools.ant.util). Stefan

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread John McNally
I made a request for access to nagoya so that I could take over maintenance of the scarab installation there. I never heard back from you; I would/should have followed up, but Jason made the offer of the werken.com box so I took him up on it. I don't see a reason to keep two instances of scarab

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread Steve Downey
That is just evil. It reminds me of the hacks for browser detection. And is as reliable. The 'right' way to do it is with System properties. You might need to query a few to get at what you're looking for, though. The on point ones are: java.specification.version java.vendor java.version

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 26/9/02 19:43, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I made a request for access to nagoya so that I could take over maintenance of the scarab installation there. I never heard back from you; I would/should have followed up, but Jason made the offer of the werken.com box so I took him up

Re: Issue tracking

2002-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
IIRC /opt/mysql/bin/mysqlclient Pier On 27/9/02 2:47 am, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you. Now is there a mysql client on this box? john mcnally On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 17:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 26/9/02 22:54, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Emacs? I

db@apache.org

2002-09-26 Thread Ray Tayek
hi, there was a general list for some new db stuff. but it seems to have moved. does anyone know where it lives these days? thanks --- ray tayek http://home.attbi.com/~rtayek/ actively seeking telecommuting work vice chair orange county java users group http://www.ocjug.org/ mailto:[EMAIL

Re: db@apache.org

2002-09-26 Thread Martin Poeschl
Ray Tayek wrote: hi, there was a general list for some new db stuff. but it seems to have moved. does anyone know where it lives these days? [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That happens to fail for Kaffe. It has ThreadLocal, but not Swing. So it's not really 1.2, for all purposes. That's the example I used in my first post, yes 8-) Kaffe is JDK 1.2 for Ant's purposes (it supports context classloaders,

Re: Getting JVM version

2002-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 'right' way to do it is with System properties. Not really. Most of the properties you list will simply not exist for some JVMs and others have formats that are not predictable for non-Sun JVMs. What I was trying to say is that