Someone said that you were mirroring the com.sun packages.. Is that
bad? I showed that it was.
If you're not, then obviously it doesn't apply.
We "mirror" by having an API that "looks" similar in its class
hierarchy, but that is the only similarity. Different package names, etc.
IANAL, AFA
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 06:54 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Ok, that's a bunch of stuff we're not allowed to do (regarding package
names), and AFAICT we (XJavaDoc) are not doing any of that.
What's your point Andy?
Someone said that you were mirroring the com.sun packages.. Is that
bad
Ok, that's a bunch of stuff we're not allowed to do (regarding package
names), and AFAICT we (XJavaDoc) are not doing any of that.
What's your point Andy?
Someone said that you were mirroring the com.sun packages.. Is that
bad? I showed that it was.
If you're not, then obviously it doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26. mars 2003 20:10
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: XDoclet, XJavaDoc, Apache and Licensing
>
>
> >
> > No, not implementing any JavaDoc API at all. I think the main issue
> > is that the API "mirro
No, not implementing any JavaDoc API at all. I think the main issue
is that the API "mirrors" the com.sun.* API in terms of the source
code model that it builds.
*http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/j2sdk-1_4_1_02-license.html
"
4. Java Technology Restrictions.* You may not modify the Java Platform
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26. mars 2003 20:00
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: XDoclet, XJavaDoc, Apache and Licensing
>
>
> Has anyone just asked Sun for their official stance on the matter?
>
No. I'd love to ask them, but
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Costin Manolache
> Sent: 26. mars 2003 18:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XDoclet, XJavaDoc, Apache and Licensing
>
>
> Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
>
>
> > The XDoclet project (http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/) is cons
Has anyone just asked Sun for their official stance on the matter?
Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> >> We believe that these differences are sufficient in order to avoid
> >> potential licensing problems with Sun.
>
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
We believe that these differences are sufficient in order to avoid
potential licensing problems with Sun.
I'm not sure I understand where the licensing problems would come from.
Are you using any code from javadoc or Sun ? Are you
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 01:27 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i believe that XDoclet would now have to be incubated (rather than
going straight into jakarta). i think that one of the functions of the
incubation process would be to give definite answers on these kinds of
questions.
We'
i think that licensing would be the right list to ask on.
i believe that XDoclet would now have to be incubated (rather than going
straight into jakarta). i think that one of the functions of the
incubation process would be to give definite answers on these kinds of
questions.
- robert
On Wed
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
> The XDoclet project (http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/) is considering
> applying for Jakarta/Apache membership.
Glad to hear that !
> We believe that these differences are sufficient in order to avoid
> potential licensing problems with Sun.
I'm not sure I understand
Dion,
I looked, and when I found it it was as easy to do as to explain, so I did it..
It's in turbine/.htaccess
I removed the "index.html" from the end of the redirect destination so now links
redirect correctly, eg:
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/maven/features.html
becomes
http://maven.apa
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how/where this redirect can be set up?
Take a look at the .htaccess file on jakarta.apache.org, which already
contains redirects for james, ant and avalon.
Oh, before you change it on the server, it is under CVS control
(docs/.ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how/where this redirect can be set up?
I'm assuming it's in the httpd.conf of the web server on daedalus.
Is this even remotely close?
Take a look at /www/jakarta.apache.org/.htaccess on daedalus. Search
for maven.
- Sam Ruby
-
Is there some other e-mail list where we should should discuss the
xjavadoc licensing issue? infrastructure? Or...???
Thanks,
Erik
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 08:54 AM, Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
Hello,
The XDoclet project (http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/) is considering
applying for
Does anyone know how/where this redirect can be set up?
I'm assuming it's in the httpd.conf of the web server on daedalus.
Is this even remotely close?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
17 matches
Mail list logo
