Re: [site] Kill the vendor support page

2006-02-07 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Well, there's not many people on it. I'd solicit their opinion. Do they actually get business from this page? If not, then definitely kill it. If such people do get business from this page, I'm less certain. Specifically, if the vendors are Jakarta committers, and they find the pages useful,

Re: [site] Kill the vendor support page

2006-02-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to kill it. On 2/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the > vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta > support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP >

[site] Kill the vendor support page

2006-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell
As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP Server. Alternatively, we could attempt to make it a Java support page

Re: Add Xythos Software to Specialized Solution Provider

2006-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry to bounce you over to another list Melissa, but Tomcat is no longer in Jakarta. You could try mailing their list (dev@tomcat.apache.org), but bear in mind that they don't have a vendor support page. In fact, now that Tomcat has moved to tomcat.apache.org, the Vendor support page has le

Add Xythos Software to Specialized Solution Provider

2006-02-07 Thread Melissa Kern
I would like to submit the following to be added as a Specialized Solution Provider to your http://jakarta.apache.org/site/vendors.html page. Company: Xythos Software Description: Xythos is a leading developer of easy-to-use solutions for managing and sharing content of any type using open stand

Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP

2006-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to

Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP

2006-02-07 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Nobody is very sure of the protocol here. I suspect that if someone felt strongly enough, they could start a vote to prevent the Tapestry team from submitting the request to the Apache board. I'm -1 on that! On 2/7/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:4

Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP

2006-02-07 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 2/7/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move > > Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the > > Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitt

Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP

2006-02-07 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move > Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the > Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. is another VOTE needed for app

[RESULT] Tapestry TLP

2006-02-07 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. === Establish the Apache Tapestry Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in th