Tom Beighley wrote:
> I just noticed there is a typo on the page:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/howto/quick.html
>
> Under the "minimum workers.properties" section
>
> worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300
>
> should be
>
> worker.worker1.recycle_timeout=300
>
> (recycle is misspelle
I just noticed there is a typo on the page:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/howto/quick.html
Under the "minimum workers.properties" section
worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300
should be
worker.worker1.recycle_timeout=300
(recycle is misspelled)
Maybe not a big issue, but for newbies l
Problem is, you're the only person who's come out and said that. Cliff's
not looked into the legalities of trademarks yet and no one on the PRC had
a yes/no answer.
Hen
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
I've come to understand that a name Apache FOO does not violate the
trade
I'm in favour of boring as I'm pushing for a Jakarta made up of
components, and not sub-projects. Http Components, Web Components would
just be groupings of components to improve the information architecture of
the site/mail-lists/whatever where necessary.
Catchy names would be used for the
I'd also prefer a one-word catchy name to something uber-geeky like
Web Components, so if we really can't use Silk we can come up with
some other options and have a new vote...
Yoav
On 2/27/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've come to understand that a name Apache FOO does no
The HttpClient 2.x codebase is hereby declared "end of life". This means:
* The HttpClient 2 code base is officially unmaintained (dormant)
* There will be no more HttpClient 2.x releases
* The HttpClient 2.0 site will be taken offline as soon as the
HttpCompontents site is set up.
Communit
